As to why the *** Auto in a Revolver?

[Bob Wright]

The post recently hereabouts posed the question "Why the 10mm in a Revolver?" The obvious answer is "Why not?" Because one simply wants to do that is reason enough.

Me, I've always advocated the .30 M1 Carbine necked up to .44 caliber. This qould, of course, necessitate the design of a front loading revolver, but hasen't this been explored before? Black powder, to be sure, but still in the realm of modern powders. The .30 carbine of course as its rimless, and cast bullets offer sufficient friction for ignition, though of course need to be of the rebated heel style.

Still a viable field overlooked by the late Mr. Bill Ruger.

)


Bob Wright

 

[The Verminator]

The post recently hereabouts posed the question "Why the 10mm in a Revolver?" The obvious answer is "Why not?" Because one simply wants to do that is reason enough.

Me, I've always advocated the .30 M1 Carbine necked up to .44 caliber. This qould, of course, necessitate the design of a front loading revolver, but hasen't this been explored before? Black powder, to be sure, but still in the realm of modern powders. The .30 carbine of course as its rimless, and cast bullets offer sufficient friction for ignition, though of course need to be of the rebated heel style.

Still a viable field overlooked by the late Mr. Bill Ruger.

)


Bob Wright

If you're looking for a job writing satire.........

Don't quit your day job.

 

[Mal H]

I've always advocated the .30 M1 Carbine necked up to .44 caliber.

That's satirical enough to get this young thread closed.