Worth reading perhaps??
NO, after reading it, I don't think it was.
Perhaps, someone should send the author a white sheet & pillow case with eye holes in it, or a brown uniform with swastika armbands...
Because, while he SAYS "gun owners" what he is constantly referring to is minorities. And he flat out says that our "spineless politicians" should stop listening to minorities!!!
Where is his concern for the rights of minorities? No where in the article that I saw.
Clearly he either does not understand, or does not believe in equal protection and treatment under the law, unless it happens to favor HIS chosen agenda.
The majority of people in the US do not write for the NY Daily News. So, HE is a minority in that regard, can we ignore his right to free speech because of that?
He calls gun owners super paranoid wack jobs (if you own more than one, though I suppose if you only own one, then you are just an ordinary paranoid wack job), and chide us on our "fears" about self protection. Yet here he is, promoting HIS fear about gun owners. WHO IS THE PARANOID here???
Ok, so what if by the numbers (and decide for yourself if those claimed numbers are accurate) gun owners are a small percentage of the people? He urges politicians not to listen to them, and says "We the people have got your back".
That argument, applied to any other minority, is instantly discarded. Will the author tell the black, brown, red, yellow, LGBT, Moslem, Mormon, or any other class of defined minorities that the politicians should not listen to them, ignore their Constitutional rights, because they are only a small percentage of the population???
His attitude, and comments are elitist, and bigoted. It is allowed and even promoted by his peers, because it is about gun owners. If that exact same attitude were applied to any other minority group, he would be shunned, and banned. How is that in any way fair, and honest "reporting"??