Arsenal Strike One

If you go to Arsenal website it has a map with distributors.

I really enjoy this gun, just wish mag release would be different. Although I got mine working good now , lost trust in it. Gonna have to put few hundred rounds thru before I'd trust it to compete with it.
 
uh.... what? the strike one looks nothing like a DB9.

this is a db9
Diamondback_DB9_Review_03.jpg


this is a strike one.
SOSTDBLK9MMFS17-3.jpg
 
Yes, the DB and the Strike One both look like Glocks. I'm wondering what the Strike One does that my 25 year old Glock 17 can't do?
 
Skans said:
I'm wondering what the Strike One does that my 25 year old Glock 17 can't do?
It's claimed to have the lowest bore axis of any currently produced locked-breech pistol.

It uses a Bergmann locking block rather than Browning tilting-barrel operation. As I understand it, there is a forked block that fits over the barrel and locks the barrel and slide together for their initial travel. The takedown pin fits through a tilted slot in the locking block, and as the block, slide, and barrel recoil to the rear, the block is cammed out of engagement with the slide by the takedown pin, which stops the barrel while allowing the slide to continue to recoil to the rear. The result is that the barrel recoils purely in a straight line, theoretically enhancing accuracy.

All that being said, I'm not sure this pistol will rate much more than a collective "meh" in a market already saturated with tactical plastic. :rolleyes: Furthermore, the Strizh pistol on which it's based apparently failed the Russian military trials, and many of the Strike One's benefits are shared with the Caracal, and we all know how that pistol turned out. :(
 
Last edited:
I have a Strike One and have handled a couple DB9s. The DB9 feels way cheaper and isn't really all that similar anyway.

My Strike One is a decent shooter. Very accurate. Reliability hasn't been 100% for me, with occasional light primer strikers or failures to eject. I also can't get past the squishy trigger - I'm not big on striker triggers anyway, and this one is pretty odd and mushy. I don't find it to be a revelation in terms of how flat it shoots, and I think good technique on other guns can result in similar felt recoil and muzzle flip.
 
Lifesizepotato

I've seen your review , one I got has realle nice trigger and had zero reliability issues so far as far as light strikes or misdeeds.
But magazine latch issue as I describe in my video , has me worry
 
Your trigger doesn't have a lot of creep? I couldn't see it well in your video. Maybe they improved it for the new Speed models like yours, but all the videos I've seen of earlier ones like mine show a lot of creep and mush.
 
the Strike has been a slight turn on for me, because I haven't ever seen a rail guided barrel system like that, a kind of fixed barrel system combined with a browning tilt barrel, very cool. are they first to ever do this? the Strike also has as claimed "lowest bore axis of ANYsemi-auto firearm ever made", that's a cool claim, not quite the Rhino of semi's, but it's getting somewhere. and if claims can be substantiated, who wouldn't want "Lowest recoil of any semiautomatic pistol ever engineered"? sounds like a hard pistol to beat and it' not like they're asking a grand or more for it. the Strike seems to be getting put up on a deserved pedestal, and although expensive, it is a first in the market and get my applauds. innovations like, "short recoil, in line barrel" and "single arch trigger safety, with firing pin automatic safety", will hopefully trickle down to real world guns, at least realistic for me.

The Arsenal has been out for almost three years, so maybe these features have already been copied and they didn't fill the market fast enough before the copies came out. I don't know anything about the DiamondBack DB FS, but are they using the same "glock" type trigger safety without the second(middle) trigger? that's a really cool feature IMO and it's what makes a new product worth the money and exciting. I personally can't stand the middle triggers, don't know why.....but I do. Does the DB share a similarly low-axis? does it also have most of its parts made from 42CrMo4 steel? does it share the expensive metal finishes like 75 Hrc surface nitrite treatment on internals?
In my opinion though, the DB FS looks like a nice gun, but also looks like the function and form mirror a Glock and not the Strike, but with a worse trigger, 7 # is not much like the trigger of the Strike pistol. DB made a notoriously unreliable pocket pistol for a good price, and after quickly reading a couple reviews, it looks like they are making a notoriously unreliable full-size pistol to share in it's glory. I se they really tried to capture the "look" of the Strike, but not the heart of it.

Awesome gun Valerko, thank you for sharing. keep us updated with it reliability in a couple thousand rounds

if you haven't seen this older video of the "behind-the-scenes" factory production, it's pretty cool.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ug66P0PSlM
you can tell the designer isn't like the other firearm's industry "salespeople", he really loves and cares about what he is doing. I wish them success.
 
Last edited:
Got the mag release issue worked out for now. Hopefully it'll hold up.
Shot it at local league yesterday and ran like a champ. Drilled and cut front sight and turned it into fiber optics sight.
Trigger is excellent on this one. It is my understanding this is model with some trigger work. I've handled another one in store in .40s&w and trigger wasn't nearly as good. Everybody who handled this gun ,complemented the trigger and reset .
As far as bore axis , you really can't get any higher.
http://youtu.be/GbC2TGRQ2zg
 
Back
Top