Arrest Warrant Sought for Rep. McKinney

steelheart

Moderator
:D Arrest Warrant Sought for Rep. McKinney :D
By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer




WASHINGTON - U.S. Capitol Police on Monday sought an arrest warrant for Rep. Cynthia McKinney after she tangled with a uniformed officer last week. A spokesman for U.S. Attorney Kenneth L. Wainstein said he was reviewing the merits of the case.

"We are working with Capitol Hill police to fully understand and appreciate the incident," principal assistant U.S. Attorney Channing Phillips told The Associated Press in a telephone interview.

Neither Phillips nor the police department would say what charge was being sought against the six-term Democrat or when any warrant for her arrest might be issued.

In a statement, Capitol Police said it "has referred its investigative findings to the U.S. attorney." Filing such an affidavit is the first step in obtaining an arrest warrant. Only if Wainstein approves the affidavit can Capitol Police officials ask a judge to issue the arrest warrant.

McKinney spokesman Coz Carson acknowledged the investigation.

"We're aware that the wheels are turning in Washington," Carson said. "We have no control over what they decide to do. We will make the appropriate statement and take the appropriate action once we know where they're going."

For her part, McKinney said she expects to represent her suburban Atlanta district for many years.

"Rest assured, I am doing the work they sent me to Washington to do. Nothing is going to keep me away from my responsibilities," McKinney told a crowd of supporters in Atlanta on Monday.

McKinney, 51, scuffled with a police officer on March 29 when she entered a House office building without her identifying lapel pin and did not stop when asked. Several police sources said the officer, who was not identified, asked her three times to stop. When she kept going, he placed a hand somewhere on her and she hit him, according to the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

McKinney issued a statement of regret for the incident but no apology. She and her lawyers have repeatedly declared that she was a victim of inappropriate touching and racism and said they were considering pursuing civil action against the officer.

Asked Monday why she didn't stop as the uniformed officer asked, McKinney framed the matter in terms of race.

"The issue is racial profiling," she said on CNN's "The Situation Room."

She and her attorneys have refused to say whether she hit the officer as alleged. James Myart Jr., her lawyer, suggested on the same program that McKinney acted in self-defense.

Black clergy and lawmakers came to the defense of the firebrand congresswoman on Monday. McKinney smiled as her supporters heaped praise on her leadership and her new look — her trademark cornrows replaced earlier this year by a curly brown afro.

Her supporters tried to minimize the incident — which they called political, not criminal — but they also suggested it was an example of racial profiling. They called publicity surrounding the episode a distraction that is being used by "her enemies" to keep the congresswoman from performing her elected duties.

The Rev. Reverend Darrell D. Elligan, president of Concerned Black Clergy, called McKinney competent, courageous and committed.

"She has our support unconditionally," Elligan said. "She is not a threat to the security of our country."
 
McKinney issued a statement of regret for the incident but no apology. She and her lawyers have repeatedly declared that she was a victim of inappropriate touching and racism and said they were considering pursuing civil action against the officer.

Her supporters tried to minimize the incident — which they called political, not criminal — but they also suggested it was an example of racial profiling.

race pimp.

Now THAT was good for a laugh...

made me sick.
 
Usual BS. Did something wrong, too stupid to think up a real answer, played the race card. She deserves to be arrested. If she had any moral credentials, she'd have admitted wrongdoing, then faced the music. :barf:
 
Clearly it's Bush's fault. If he hadn't had secretly masterminded 9/11 and eventually implemented the Patriot act that forced the high level of security, particularly at governmental institutions, this never would have happened. Or so mckinney's reasoning will be.
 
Being a Devil's Advocate...

Now just wait a minute here!! It sounds as though most of the posters discussing this incident have something against the congresswoman in question, and this may be coloring their unbiased assessment of the situation.

Apparently the lady in question entered the House office building where she had a perfect right to be. The news story didn't indicate whether the officer involved recognized her. If he in fact did recognize her, perhaps a polite "Excuse me, but you've forgotten your lapel pin" would have been in order, and would have averted an embarrasing incident. On the other hand, if he didn't recognize her, perhaps his actions were appropriate, and she overreacted. However, I think the idea of an arrest warrant for what is clearly a minor incident is a bit childish, and smacks of retaliation. A mutual apology would seem to be in order here...

Regards,
JayCee
 
*scratches head*

Huh?

She already issued a statement where she avoided an apology.

it's not the job of the po-po to know every face that toddles, usually in "great haste" past them on some important(HA!) errand. That's the reason for the ID's, and the cops themselves. It's also why, if you don't have your ID, you can expect to be stopped and have an obligation to stop when told by the nice occifer just like any other Citizen.

Ms Buckwheat, after being told repeatedly to stop, kept right on motorvating. THEN she slugged the officer. That would get you and me a voyage to the Iron Bar Motel regardless of extenuating circumsances. Apologies after the fact might be good for reducing the time of the sentence. Are you suggesting this politicritter deserves different because...?

Her position?

Her color?

Her sex?

I vote none of the above. Fry her. And considering the public spectacle SHE has made of the issue, do it all right out in the open.
 
ordinary folk

How dare security forces treat her like they would any other citizen. She is clearly not ordinary folk! She is one of the (elected) nobility.

She claimed it was racial profiling. Hmmm, perhaps we should have a "Blacks only" entrance. Staffed by black security guards. Then when she gets stopped for not having the proper ID, she could not claim it was a race issue.
Of course, then we would also need a seperate entrance for "Asians", and another for "Hispanics", and another "Whites" and another for "Other", and another for .... and we would have to have diversity quotas to ensure proper staffing for security of all the different entrances. Surely we can find enough tax money for the needed renovations. But wait, didn't the Supreme Court say "seperate but equal" wasn't equal?

I say treat them just like anybody else. They work for us. They are not "above" us in any way. One of the REAL problems with our system is that so many officials are elected to "lead" us. I am not a sheep, I am not cattle, I do not require being led anywhere. The true purpose of these positions is to implement the will of the people. Not lead us. Too bad so many of them (and so many of us) don't understand or won't believe that.
 
O now IC

I wondered why the heck a member of congress would strike a cop. I thought it was messed up BEFORE I found out she was black.

Now it is clear to me.

The po black woman was jus defenin hersef n her peeps agains da man who bin hasslin her n keepin Dems down all deze years.

The message they are sending is a great one. I mean, who can argue with, "If you don't think the officer is right, or if he is white, just kick his ass and all will be excused (as long as you are black)"
I bet Police in Compton will be glad that message is being sent out from lawmakers.

But who can blame her? I mean, just a couple dozen generations ago some of her ancestors might have been taken by other black tribesmen and sold to the Dutch. They were taken out of the wilds, where every day was a fight for existance and tribes savagely beat and murdered each other, and turned into pampered house slaves here and in many other countries (and at a time when most Americans had a hard time finding food or housing).

So, with that on the collective conscience, they all deserve a free pass at whitey's expense. Nevermind the hundreds of thousands of white soldiers who gave their lives for the freedoms of the slaves. Not important. Oh, and don't forget that for the last 52 years (or about 10 generations) they had the same (or even better) schools, training and job opportunities as the rest of us (guaranteed by the U.S. government and enforced at gunpoint). That misses the point entirely.

Personally, I think they deserve to be compensated, indefinably.
When each one is born we should just issue a "get out of jail free card" to go along with all the "free food, shelter, medicine, and lawyers and everything else you want for life" coupons that they (and everyone illegally crossing at the Southern border) already get as it is.

And I am here to say that I think it is only fair that she be given special treatment, given the miserable circumstances that a congresswomen in the U.S. faces. SUch oppression and poverty. I, for one, think that she should be held above the law. I mean, what kind of bigot would think that black elected representatives should be held to the same moral standards as the rest of society, much less to a higher one?

The injustice of it all!
I am enraged!

Cummon, my bruthas. Rise up! Say wit me now…

F..K da police! Black power! K1ll Whitey! Black power!

Shooter429
 
Now just wait a minute here!! It sounds as though most of the posters discussing this incident have something against the congresswoman in question, and this may be coloring their unbiased assessment of the situation.

Apparently the lady in question entered the House office building where she had a perfect right to be. The news story didn't indicate whether the officer involved recognized her. If he in fact did recognize her, perhaps a polite "Excuse me, but you've forgotten your lapel pin" would have been in order, and would have averted an embarrasing incident. On the other hand, if he didn't recognize her, perhaps his actions were appropriate, and she overreacted. However, I think the idea of an arrest warrant for what is clearly a minor incident is a bit childish, and smacks of retaliation. A mutual apology would seem to be in order here...

Regards,
JayCee

JayCee, you must also understand that some of us with something against this woman have also followed her career and may have a better grasp of her tendencies than you might imagine.

With that out of the way, you cannot excuse McKinney's actions either way. She was told to stop. She apparently struck an officer. You may be able to find evidence that the officer did recognize her, but you cannot excuse these actions or take McKinney out of the wrong.
 
Now just wait a minute here!! It sounds as though most of the posters discussing this incident have something against the congresswoman in question, and this may be coloring their unbiased assessment of the situation.

Apparently the lady in question entered the House office building where she had a perfect right to be. The news story didn't indicate whether the officer involved recognized her. If he in fact did recognize her, perhaps a polite "Excuse me, but you've forgotten your lapel pin" would have been in order, and would have averted an embarrasing incident. On the other hand, if he didn't recognize her, perhaps his actions were appropriate, and she overreacted. However, I think the idea of an arrest warrant for what is clearly a minor incident is a bit childish, and smacks of retaliation. A mutual apology would seem to be in order here...

Regards,
JayCee


I had never heard of her prior to this, but after seeing her on TV make her statement. IMO she's a race mongering idiot. She made a mistake and refuses to own up to it. She was treated like any other person would have been treated and she's pissed. If she would have complied with the officer, then he could have checked her credentials and she would have been on her way. Instead she decided she didn't need to comply, became abusive towards an officer doing his job and now she's whining about it and they are doing what they would do towards any other citizen in the same situation. She needs to take her medicine and get over it.
 
mckinney_racecard.gif
 
People such as Cynthia McKinney decry racism, yet they will never let it die.

Racism is simply far too profitable for people such has her.
 
"However, I think the idea of an arrest warrant for what is clearly a minor incident is a bit childish, and smacks of retaliation."

Willfully striking a police officer while he is performing his duties is a crime in every jurisdiction in the United States.

It is NOT a trivial matter.

The Democrats are screaming bloody murder about how the Republicans lack ethics.

Time for them to shut up and police their own.
 
Apparently the lady in question entered the House office building where she had a perfect right to be.
But she didn't have "a perfect right" to go storming past security and ignore them when she was asked for her ID.
I think the idea of an arrest warrant for what is clearly a minor incident is a bit childish, and smacks of retaliation.
So is because she is a woman, black, or a Congressmaggot that she gets to strike a police officer and get off scot-free??

Please explain. It looks like your (Democratic) "Devil's Advocate" position is pretty much indefensible...:D

BTW, if calling someone the "D" word is an ad hominem attack, please accept my apologies - don't want to cause any hurt feelings...
 
Back
Top