One would think such a position would have been expressed by Hillary Clinton, but such was not the case.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20080420/wl_mcclatchy/2915454_1
Since the Secretary of State would be a voice of the current administration, I am very concerned that the true opinion of the Republican Party is that guns do not belong in private hands.
If this is the case, what real difference on this matter separates the Repblican candidates and the Democratic candidates ?
Is this a flag that sooner, or later theUnited States will follow England, Australia and Canada in the matter of RKBA ?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20080420/wl_mcclatchy/2915454_1
"But clearly, the prime minister has laid down some ground rules which any
functioning democratic state would insist upon, having to do with, you know,
arms belonging to the state, not to -- not in private hands," she said.
Since the Secretary of State would be a voice of the current administration, I am very concerned that the true opinion of the Republican Party is that guns do not belong in private hands.
If this is the case, what real difference on this matter separates the Repblican candidates and the Democratic candidates ?
Is this a flag that sooner, or later theUnited States will follow England, Australia and Canada in the matter of RKBA ?
Last edited by a moderator: