I have been recommending that the state first test,then train, license and arm teachers for almost 18 months now.
The liberals and socialists will not listen
to the correct answer to the problem but deride and make fun of us instead.
And yet , the liberals and socialists
incorrect and wrong headed gun free terror zones,excuse me, gun free school zones is the politically correct term,
[the Colimbine victims will tell you about gun free terror zones] continue to cost the lives of our childern.
Because of this unfounded & uncalled for derision ,I blame the socialists and the liberals for the school shootings because their political agenda guarantees that criminal gun men in our schools will not have any armed opposition and have free reign to shoot as many students as they can before police finally arive and finally get around to decieding to enter the building.
This decision by police to enter the building
sometimes occurs as late as 30 minutes after the last gun shot has been fired by the felons.
This undue caution is necessary to insure that no police are needlessly endangered and that our childern die instead of our policemen.
(This may seem fair to Al Gore and Bill Clinton, but not to me!)
For some unfounded reason, I seem to think that the police should rush in to save our childern; but authorities do not agree.
I must have "Old Fashioned Values" and "Old
Fashioned Common Sense" both of which seem to be vanishing commodities these days.
At any rate,and , for all the good it will do, some one has finally joined their voice to mine, below.
James Crispino wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: press@gunsafe.org <press@gunsafe.org>
> To: Gunsafe members <press@gunsafe.org>
> Date: Saturday, April 29, 2000 11:31 AM
> Subject: Lawmaker proposes arming school staffs
>
> >This was on page 8A of the Waterbury Republican 04/28/00. Doesn't seem to
> be available on the Internet.
> >
> >Lawmaker proposes arming school staffs
> >
> >DENVER-A Colorado lawmaker wants to arm 10 percent of each school's
> >staff - including teachers- as part of a safe-schools package.
> >
> >State Rep. Mark Paschall's proposal, which he included as part of the
> >governor's education program, shocked some legislators Wednesday. The House
> >refused to even consider it, and some lawmakers dismissed it as a lark.
> >
> >But Paschall, R-Arvada, insisted, I'm dead serious."
> >
> >Paschall said he had considered sponsoring a separate bill earlier this
> >session at the request of some teachers in Jefferson County, home of the
> >Columbine High School shooting tragedy. Under Paschall's proposal, at least
> >10 percent of each school's staff would be trained to use firearms and be
> >issued permits to carry concealed weapons. Only the principal and the
> >permit-holders would know who was packing a weapon, he said, so potential
> >gunmen wouldn't know who to take out.
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ernest2 --opinion---
The liberals and socialists seem to think that their way is the only way that something good can be acomplished and they are , in my opinion, very very wrong about this.
Their wrong headed attitude is actually causing the school shooting problem.
They insist upon forcing their failed
victim disarmament scheemes upon us and
refuse to take responsibility when their
failed policy produces the expected totally
unnecessary and preventable deaths.
In My Opinion,this is a fine example of the - care--less misuse of authority and power and of the price "We The People and Our Childern" must pay for their victim disarmament political agendas.
It is,in my opinion, proof that mostly
what they care about is their power and political agenda and not properly safe guarding our childern by arming the teachers.
I find it quite funny that they have armed guards for money and jewelery but not for our childern.
This of course,and in my opinion, must mean that their money and their jewelery are more important to them than the live of just one child, or 12 childern and one teacher.
How often have you heard them say"IF It Saves Just One Live" and "Lets Do It For The Childern" when they are proposing yet another victim disarmament law that focuses on law abiding gun owners while missing the cause of the problem, criminals, completely.
And yet , this May 14th, we will have to endure their "Do As I Say and Not As I Do"
hypocracy, yet again, as they make yet another in a never ending secession of attacks upon our Constitution and our Second Ammendment Civil Rights.
Some one should remind them that their rights stop when they begin to infringe on our rights.
(I have not done a good rant in some time so this one should hold off the urge for some little time, at least.)
[This message has been edited by ernest2 (edited April 30, 2000).]
The liberals and socialists will not listen
to the correct answer to the problem but deride and make fun of us instead.
And yet , the liberals and socialists
incorrect and wrong headed gun free terror zones,excuse me, gun free school zones is the politically correct term,
[the Colimbine victims will tell you about gun free terror zones] continue to cost the lives of our childern.
Because of this unfounded & uncalled for derision ,I blame the socialists and the liberals for the school shootings because their political agenda guarantees that criminal gun men in our schools will not have any armed opposition and have free reign to shoot as many students as they can before police finally arive and finally get around to decieding to enter the building.
This decision by police to enter the building
sometimes occurs as late as 30 minutes after the last gun shot has been fired by the felons.
This undue caution is necessary to insure that no police are needlessly endangered and that our childern die instead of our policemen.
(This may seem fair to Al Gore and Bill Clinton, but not to me!)
For some unfounded reason, I seem to think that the police should rush in to save our childern; but authorities do not agree.
I must have "Old Fashioned Values" and "Old
Fashioned Common Sense" both of which seem to be vanishing commodities these days.
At any rate,and , for all the good it will do, some one has finally joined their voice to mine, below.
James Crispino wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: press@gunsafe.org <press@gunsafe.org>
> To: Gunsafe members <press@gunsafe.org>
> Date: Saturday, April 29, 2000 11:31 AM
> Subject: Lawmaker proposes arming school staffs
>
> >This was on page 8A of the Waterbury Republican 04/28/00. Doesn't seem to
> be available on the Internet.
> >
> >Lawmaker proposes arming school staffs
> >
> >DENVER-A Colorado lawmaker wants to arm 10 percent of each school's
> >staff - including teachers- as part of a safe-schools package.
> >
> >State Rep. Mark Paschall's proposal, which he included as part of the
> >governor's education program, shocked some legislators Wednesday. The House
> >refused to even consider it, and some lawmakers dismissed it as a lark.
> >
> >But Paschall, R-Arvada, insisted, I'm dead serious."
> >
> >Paschall said he had considered sponsoring a separate bill earlier this
> >session at the request of some teachers in Jefferson County, home of the
> >Columbine High School shooting tragedy. Under Paschall's proposal, at least
> >10 percent of each school's staff would be trained to use firearms and be
> >issued permits to carry concealed weapons. Only the principal and the
> >permit-holders would know who was packing a weapon, he said, so potential
> >gunmen wouldn't know who to take out.
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ernest2 --opinion---
The liberals and socialists seem to think that their way is the only way that something good can be acomplished and they are , in my opinion, very very wrong about this.
Their wrong headed attitude is actually causing the school shooting problem.
They insist upon forcing their failed
victim disarmament scheemes upon us and
refuse to take responsibility when their
failed policy produces the expected totally
unnecessary and preventable deaths.
In My Opinion,this is a fine example of the - care--less misuse of authority and power and of the price "We The People and Our Childern" must pay for their victim disarmament political agendas.
It is,in my opinion, proof that mostly
what they care about is their power and political agenda and not properly safe guarding our childern by arming the teachers.
I find it quite funny that they have armed guards for money and jewelery but not for our childern.
This of course,and in my opinion, must mean that their money and their jewelery are more important to them than the live of just one child, or 12 childern and one teacher.
How often have you heard them say"IF It Saves Just One Live" and "Lets Do It For The Childern" when they are proposing yet another victim disarmament law that focuses on law abiding gun owners while missing the cause of the problem, criminals, completely.
And yet , this May 14th, we will have to endure their "Do As I Say and Not As I Do"
hypocracy, yet again, as they make yet another in a never ending secession of attacks upon our Constitution and our Second Ammendment Civil Rights.
Some one should remind them that their rights stop when they begin to infringe on our rights.
(I have not done a good rant in some time so this one should hold off the urge for some little time, at least.)
[This message has been edited by ernest2 (edited April 30, 2000).]