Are you having trouble veiwing my site?

J

John/az2

New member
I need some feedback from you all.

IF you are having trouble viewing my site www.cphv.com, please write me and tell me<UL TYPE=SQUARE>
<LI>what browser you are using
<LI>what resolution your screen is set at
<LI>and if you have java script enabled or not.
</UL>

Your feedback would be greatly appreciated.

I'll only bump this to the top once more.

Thanks!

------------------
John/az
"When freedom is at stake, your silence is not golden, it's yellow..." RKBA!

See The Legacy of Gun Control film at: www.cphv.com

Do it for the children...

[This message has been edited by John/az2 (edited September 20, 2000).]
 
You need to edit the comma out of the hyperlink to the site you have up there because it's not working.

Anyway, I'm running IE 5.5 java enabled @ 800 x 600 and it's way to wide, it must be set at 1280 x ? fixed width because I have to scroll at the bottom to get across the page. Hope that helps.

[This message has been edited by scud (edited September 20, 2000).]
 
Communicator 4.72 128bit
Java enabled
800x600 16bit

Works like a charm(other than the comma in your link). Looks good.

I also used IE5 and experienced the same results that scud did.

HTH,
Evan
 
John
I am runnin IE 4.0, Java, 800X600. Your home page is two screens wide, interior pages seem to fit OK.

Side note, your background is tolerable, many make it too dificult for old eyes to read the text.

Sam..I may not be puter literate but at least I don't know what I'm doin.
 
Dang! That is nasty!

I changed my resolution to 800x600 and things went wild!

I'm using Dreamweaver to create the page, does anyone know what could be the problem?


------------------
John/az
"When freedom is at stake, your silence is not golden, it's yellow..." RKBA!

See The Legacy of Gun Control film at: www.cphv.com

Do it for the children...
 
I just rebuilt the whole thing.

It worked this time in 800x600, but if it's still messed up...If I missed anything, please let me know.

Thanks so much for the feedback!

------------------
John/az
"When freedom is at stake, your silence is not golden, it's yellow..." RKBA!

See The Legacy of Gun Control film at: www.cphv.com

Do it for the children...
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by C.R.Sam:
Side note, your background is tolerable, many make it too dificult for old eyes to read the text.[/quote]

Sam,

Your suggestion for making the text more readable is welcome. Please post it here or e-mail me.



------------------
John/az
"When freedom is at stake, your silence is not golden, it's yellow..." RKBA!

See The Legacy of Gun Control film at: www.cphv.com

Do it for the children...
 
At 1152x768 the straight talk button overlaps on the POFI 2 button. This is on Netscape 4.75. Other than that it looks good. Even the buttons I mentioned are still readable.

markd
 
If only all who maintain a RKBA site were as concerned about the readability of their site as you are :rolleyes:.

------------------
"Anyone feel like saluting the flag which the strutting ATF and FBI gleefully raised over the smoldering crematorium of Waco, back in April of ‘93?" -Vin Suprynowicz
 
Mark,

It's supposed to.

Deanf,

I'm not quite sure what you are trying to say.

But, if you're slamming this, my small contribution to RKBA, then it's not appreciated.
 
I'm running Win Me and IE 5.50.x. Your homepage was fine up to 1152x864 but goes white at 1280x1024 (but this could be my screen and graphics card). I checked all of the way down to 640x480 and it worked fine for me. In all modes I was running True Color at 24 bits.
 
John,
Netscape 4.73 at 8X6 is easy on myself. Java is an impetuous imp but allows you to pass on my screen. :) Thanks for keeping up the good fight!
 
Linux Netscape® Communicator 4.72
1600x1200, 32-bit
Java-script is enabled.

Looks fine to me. BTW, browser is "toned-down" to about 1024x768.


------------------
God, Guns and Guts made this country a great country!

oberkommando sez:
"We lost the first and third and now they are after the Second!(no pun intended)"
 
John, your site is fine. It's Great. Always has been.

I was refering to another much-promoted RKBA site that is hard to read, but which, not withstanding many complaints in many forums, is still left in it's cumbersome to navigate and difficult to read form.

I know direct personal attacks are frowned upon here, so I didn't want to name names. I should have explained myself a little better. Sorry.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top