The problem i see with all this compliant stock legal gerrymandering
is that the elected representatives goal is the complete removal of all semiauto weapons from CA.
The intent of the law is to restrict the ownership of semiautos from the civilian, non LEO population.
We escaped this fate temporarily, when the 94 ban was to narrow in description,
It failed to have the desire legal goal because it was based on the visual appearance of current examples.
The market adjusted and CA had a postban window of 6 years to buy semiautos.
Now the law has returned with enough legal teeth to ban you from inheriting a legally owned family gun in CA.
As i said before, combine SB-23 with the language in Florida's Bill,
and we have the binding formula to insure that "the Militia" is only armed with technology from 2 centuries ago!
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/session/2000/House/bills/billtext/html/billtext/hb0363.html
>listed are ~ 45 specific guns including:
>e. Colt AR-15 series.
>later on they define "series":
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>For purposes of this paragraph, the term "series" includes all
>other models that are only variations, with minor differences,
>of those models listed in this paragraph, regardless of the
>manufacturer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The only way we can stop this trend is to give any Politician
who steps anywhere near this Unconstitutional BS,
the electorial Tar & feather treatment
Meanwhile the Million Mom March for gun control, on Mothers day in DC
will have 9,936 more participants than the DC March for Liberty
(we were out numbered by men in red dresses)
dZ
------------------
"walk softly and carry a big stick, one that goes bang in .308 is fine"
