AP - Jury Flips Coin To Decide Murder Over Manslaughter

STORY

Apr 25, 2000 - 06:10 AM


Jury Flips Coin to Decide Murder Over Manslaughter
The Associated Press

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) - Jurors who couldn't decide whether to convict a man of murder or manslaughter in the shooting death of his girlfriend flipped a coin and found him guilty of murder. However, the judge declared a mistrial after finding out about the coin toss.
Phillip J. Givens II, 28, would have faced life in prison if convicted of murder in the death of Monica Briggs, 29, last May. A new trial was scheduled for Sept. 12.

The jury of five men and seven women deliberated about nine hours over two days last week before issuing the verdict Friday.

Jury foreman David Melton told The Courier-Journal for today's editions the jurors decided to flip a silver dollar to avoid a hung jury. Because all agreed on the coin toss, they thought it was legal, he said.

"Realistically, I didn't think we had anything to lose," Melton said. "We were going to be hung without it."

But when the jurors returned to court Monday to recommend a sentence, Jefferson Circuit Judge Kenneth Conliffe ordered a new trial after telling Melton he had heard about the coin toss, and Melton confirmed that it happened.

Brian Butler, one of the prosecutors in the case, said one of the jurors apparently told someone about the coin toss, and that person told a Jefferson County court employee. The court employee told a judge, who brought it to Conliffe's attention, Butler said.

Three of the jurors declined to comment to the newspaper. The others could not be reached by the newspaper.

Conliffe also declined to be interviewed.

Givens' lawyer, Mark Chandler, said it's "scary" to think that 12 people would decide to flip a coin to reach a verdict, especially in a murder case.

"It kind of blows your mind," he said. "I think they had a lapse in judgment, and I'd like to think it doesn't go on very often."


------------------
Slowpoke Rodrigo...he pack a gon...

Vote for the Neal Knox 13

I'll see you at the TFL End Of Summer Meet!
 
Wow, I, too, hope this incident was an aberration. It does tend to undermine my faith in juries. The judge was certainly right to declare a mistrial.
 
"Better to be tried by 12..."

I seriously doubt the wisdom of that.
rolleyes.gif
 
Holy crap Batman! These are the kind of people who die in horrible explosions when using matches to see how much gasoline is in a bucket......

They thought it would be legal if they all agreed to it????

They thought the worst thing that could happen was a hung jury????

Isn't this some sort of crime?
 
:eek: :eek:

The mind rejects what the senses can't deny.

Another example of how our country's getting nuttier and nuttier.

------------------
ALARM! ALARM! CIVILIZATION IS IN PERIL! THE BARBARIANS HAVE TAKEN THE GATES!
 
Many judges "force" the jury to avoid a hung jury and come back with a verdict, pro or con. This makes for bad verdicts as much as any coin flip or other similar method for a coming together of minds to avoid the wrath of the judge for daring to come back with a hung jury, that is, the individual jury members came their own individual decisions without coercion by the judge.

There is nothing wrong with a hung jury. It means that the prosecutor did not sufficiently prove his case to one or more of them. With a hung jury, the prosecution has the option of retrying the case.

Not a big deal.

We keep seeing these odd jury decisions for that reason. The judge pressures them. As well, both the judge and the prosecutor, and to some extent, the defense attorney, if the defendant is rich, engage in legal jury stacking through the voir dere selection processs using hired jury selection experts.

Go back to a random jury pool so that those selected are not selected because the attorney thinks they are dumb enough for him to sway them. Try being a gun owner and get on a jury. Good luck, especially in a gun product liability suit.

If we had no jury stacking, the best OJ could have hoped for in his criminal murder trial was a hung jury, not complete acquital. The prosecutor could have tried him again.

Don't give up on the jury system. Give up on legal jury stacking by officers of the court.

Rick
 
Back
Top