First of all, I know what a horrible design it is and that it is a festering sore spot on the reputation of Remington. I've had one (742 Woodsmaster .30-06) since the mid 80s. I learned very early on the importance of scrubbing every little spec out of it after shooting it. Looking back...overall it's really been probably the most reliable rifle I'll never trust. I jammed it up a few times in the early years when I thought cleaning a rifle just meant cleaning the barrel with a cleaning rod and WD40 It gummed up and jammed/wouldn't chamber a round...I tore it apart, saw what was so gummed up and why it wouldn't work ...and never had the problem again. I would never drive 200 miles to go hunting and that be my only rifle in the truck...No freaking way. But...over the years, once I learned how to properly clean a rifle, and after hearing all the problems that particular model had (twisting gear head looking bolt eating away the soft aluminum inside), I kept mine spotless and lubricated. Even today, inside and out, I'd say it's 99%...probably because I never hunted with it. Other than one little speck /bright mark on the receiver, it looks close to new. The serial number dates it to late 60s-early 70s. It was given to me in '85 by a family member. All I can say is, it's not a rifle that can take any abuse but if kept clean and lubed, seems to be as reliable as any other...I still don't trust it though