Any help with identifing this rifle?

M

magnuumpwr

Inactive
This gun was given to me and was told that it was a muzzleloader. This it is not, but exactly what it is, is a mystery to me. I know that it is a 7.62X54R, but that is where my knowledge about this rifle ends. Here are a few pics.
DSC02366.jpg

No, it's the bottom one.
DSC02365.jpg

This is the stampings on top of the chamber.
DSC02369.jpg

Side view of the rear sight.
DSC02371.jpg

Rear sight flipped up.
DSC02370.jpg

Front sight.
Any ideas
 
Last edited:
You can either measure the barrel or the whole rifle. If you look at the first link I gave you, there is a chart which shows lengths for the different models.
 
This site has an excellent Mosin-Nagant model identification guide.

http://7.62x54r.net/

A few thoughts:
  • It is either an M91 Infantry Rifle or an M91 Dragoon Rifle, depending on its length. The Infantry rifles measure 51-1/4" (130cm) long overall, while the Dragoons are 48-3/4" (124cm) long.
  • Most of these rifles were converted to M91/30 standards during or shortly after the Great Patriotic War (known as World War II to Westerners). ;) Converted models are quite common and cheap, but unconverted rifles like yours are somewhat of a rarity, and are more valuable than garden-variety M91/30s. (M91/30s are Dragoon length and have a flat rear sight and a hooded front sight, as well as a number of other minor differences.)
  • If it lacks import marks, it's even MORE of a rarity. However, importers usually stamp or engrave the LH side of the receiver or the barrel base, which aren't visible in your pictures.
  • FYI the rear sight is gradated in arshini (singular: arshin), an obsolete Imperial Russian unit of measurement equal to 2'-4", 0.77yd, and 0.71m.
  • FWIW the "r" mark after the year of production stands for the Russian word for "year". The numerical year in the Russian language is an adjective, not a stand-alone noun like in English, so it must always be followed by the word "year" to be grammatically correct. For instance, a Russian would say, "The rifle was made in the 1929 year", rather than "The rifle was made in 1929".
 
Here are some more pics to help.
762X54RRifle001.jpg

Taped from butt to muzzle.
762X54RRifle002.jpg

Tape at the end of muzzle.
DSC02379.jpg

Right side of chamber.
DSC02372.jpg

Bottom of chamber.
More762X54RPics001.jpg

Left side of chamber is slick with no stamps at all.
More762X54RPics002.jpg

Symbol on top left edge of chamber.
 
Wowzers! It looks like you've got a mostly original non-import-marked Dragoon. :cool:

Do you have any idea where this rifle came from, or how the person who gave it to you obtained it? There's a story behind it, because it's probably a battlefield pick-up taken as a souvenir by an American soldier during WWII, Korea, or Vietnam. Even though this type was technically outdated during WWII, the Soviets were so deperately short on rifles early in the war that they armed their soldiers with whatever they could find. In the postwar era, the Soviets gave large numbers of obsolescent rifles to their satellite countries and to Marxist guerrilla groups in capitalist countries. North Korean, Chinese, and North Vietnamese soldiers were often found armed with Mosin-Nagants of all types.

{EDIT} Check if the serial numbers match on the barrel, bolt, top of the buttplate, and the bottom of the magazine floorplate. If the number on the bolt doesn't match the barrel, do not fire this rifle until it is thoroughly inspected by a gunsmith.
 
Of the 4 serial #'ed parts, none are the same. I was trying to check for the value of this gun prior to doing any having it re-blued or having the stock refinished. This gun looks pretty rough and thought that it could use some TLC.
 
Don't refinish it, reblue it, or anything like that. It will be more valuable as-is, despite the fact that it's beat-up and the numbers don't match.

FWIW it's common for Mosin-Nagants to have non-matching numbers, or renumbered parts that have had the old serial numbers lined out and the correct serial number engraved or stamped in their place. These rifles led harsh lives and most of them are "parts guns" to some extent. Furthermore, if the bringback theory is correct, the Soviets wouldn't have cared if the bolt blew back in the face of some Southeast Asian peasant. :rolleyes:
 
Yes, this is a Dragoon from the last year of production (in 1930, all Mosin production was converted to the 1891/30, instead of having separate Infantry, Dragoon, Cavalry, and Carbine versions, but they put the M44 Carbine into production after WW2 experience showed that it was better for manoeuvrability). It's marked as being made at the Izhevsk arsenal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top