I'm getting an AT-84S and have been researching them.
I'm still not sure about whether or not they take genuine CZ mags (but the standard mag for these is 15 rds., just like a CZ, and not 16 rounds like the TZ/Witness).
The first AT-84s were IDENTICAL to the CZ-75, and were built as part of a licensing agreement with CZ. CZ broke this by allowing Bauska to import the Czech made guns to the US. It is very likely that these were marked "CZ."
ITM Ag started marketing the gun entirely on their own at this point, eventually upgrading it to the AT-88, mimicing the CZ-85. The AT-88 is significantly different from CZs and the AT-84, not the least of which is a non-interchangeable (with previous AT-84s) Peters-Stahl barrel.
F---ups and delays by British and Italian subcontactors compromised the whole arrangement, forcing sale to Sphinx Ag to cover debts.
I forgot where I read this, but I think some of this may be in the "Blue Book."
I'm still not sure about whether or not they take genuine CZ mags (but the standard mag for these is 15 rds., just like a CZ, and not 16 rounds like the TZ/Witness).
The first AT-84s were IDENTICAL to the CZ-75, and were built as part of a licensing agreement with CZ. CZ broke this by allowing Bauska to import the Czech made guns to the US. It is very likely that these were marked "CZ."
ITM Ag started marketing the gun entirely on their own at this point, eventually upgrading it to the AT-88, mimicing the CZ-85. The AT-88 is significantly different from CZs and the AT-84, not the least of which is a non-interchangeable (with previous AT-84s) Peters-Stahl barrel.
F---ups and delays by British and Italian subcontactors compromised the whole arrangement, forcing sale to Sphinx Ag to cover debts.
I forgot where I read this, but I think some of this may be in the "Blue Book."