manta49 said:
The advice given buy most on this forum is carry with a round in the chamber. Without knowing the abilities of the people they are advising. You get the usual stupid comments a unloaded gun is a paper weight ect.
Did he really need to have the round in the chamber. Carry with a round in the chamber but don't be surprised when things like this happen.
Remember not everyone is as expert as and sensible as the people on this forum.
PS Obviously putting the gun to your head to prove its not loaded is not a good idea. But other people have shot them selves thinking a gun was unloaded. Like the DEA expert on youtube.
Sir, with all due respect, your bias and your ignorance are showing.
Point One:
It does not matter if he "needed" to have a round in the chamber. Firearms safety protocol
mandates that a firearm be cleared before handling for any purpose other than firing it. Clearing for a semi-automatic includes removing the magazine, then racking the slide to eject any round that may be "hiding" in the chamber, and then physically looking into the chamber to verify that you got that last sneaky little devil out of the chamber. Even after all that, you simply do NOT point the firearm at anyone (yourself or any other person) and pull the trigger.
Point Two: One does not need to be an "expert" to practice firearms safety. This guy attended West Point. That's the United States (
ARMY) Military Academy. They shoot guns at West Point. I am absolutely certain that they teach weapons safety to their cadets. Basic weapons safety includes "Don't point a gun at your head and pull the trigger." In addition, he was in Connecticut. Connecticut has required possession of either a pistol carry permit or a "Certificate of Eligibility" before buying a handgun for at least two or three decades (in other words, for MUCH longer than this guy had been of age to buy or legally possess a handgun). In order to obtain either, an applicant must complete a minimum one-day course in handgun safety. The usual such course is the NRA "Basic Pistol" course. Since I am certified to teach that course, I know very well that it includes such things as not pointing a gun at your head and pulling the trigger.
The incident is extremely unfortunate, but no matter how you analyze it or parse it, the bottom line is that he shot himself because he ignored multiple of the basic rules of firearms safety. Your trying to suggest that this wouldn't have happened if he didn't have a round in the chamber is a complete and total
non sequitur, or what we here in the States call a "red herring."
How many of the rules did he violate? The NRA has three basic rules and nine or ten supplementary rules. Personally, I prefer Cooper's four, so let's go with that. They were stated in an earlier post:
1) All guns are always loaded.
If he had handled the pistol as if it was loaded, he would not have done what he did. Fail #1
2) Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.
Unless we are to accept that he was willing to destroy his own head, Fail #2
3) Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on the target.
He didn't have a target, and he couldn't see the sights with the gun pointed at his own head anyway. Since it is unlikely he intended for his own head to be the target, Fail #3
4) Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.
Again, any time you pull the trigger on a firearm there is an implicit assumption that a bullet may (and probably will) strike something. Again assuming that he didn't intend for his own head to be a target, he was NOT sure of his target when he pulled the trigger. Fail #4
Well, lookie there. Not even a trifecta, but a perfect four-for-four. I would have to say that even most people who experience negligent discharges probably don't manage to violate ALL FOUR rules in one incident.