Another Man Shot at Gun Show

Dennis

Staff Emeritus
TRAGIC NEWS!!!
QUOTE: San Antonio Express-News, Monday, 2-8-99; PAGE ONE (1A)

Collector accidentally shot at gun show
By Lisa Sandberg; San Antonio Express-News Staff Writer.

A 31-year old man attending a North Side gun show was shot in the leg Sunday morning by another customer who mistakenly believed the Walter .380-caliber pistol he was handling was unloaded, police said.

Police were investigating the possibility that a prankster inserted a bullet into the gun's chamber some time after the display was set up Sunday morning. ...

Charges weren't likely to be filed against the customer who fired the weapon or the owner of the gun display, (San Antonio Police Sgt.) Cannon said. ...

Sunday's incident prompted gun control advocates and the National Rifle Association to agree on the need for gun safety.

Also, it occurred just one day after President Clinton used his weekly national radio address to endorse legislation that would toughen the control on sales at gun shows.

Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., is sponsoring the legislation. It would extend the background checks required under the federal Brady Law to gun buyers at gun shows.

Mark Nevins, a spokesman for Lautenberg, called the incident "clearly a dangerous situation" that could have been avoided with mandatory safety devices.
"The key here is we need to hold the firearms industry responsible for accidents with their guns," Nevins said. ...

The gun show's manager, Frank Smith, said the man handling the handgun had removed a plastic security band from the weapon -- designed to prevent accidental discharges -- so he could get a better look at it. ...

Smith said a bullet struck the ceiling of the convention center last year when a gun accidentally discharged during a gun show.

UNQUOTE

Exclusive of headlines, bylines, and credits, the article comes to 19.25 inches. It further explains:
-- The gun had been properly cleared upon entry to the show.
-- The gun had been secured with the usual plastic cable tie.
-- The tie had been removed so the customer could "get a better look" at the gun.
-- Removing the tie is acceptable.

IMHO:
1) To surreptitiously load someone else's firearm should be a felony. "Prankster" does not apply.
2) The person responsible for the gun did not clear (check) the gun before letting the customer handle it.
3) The customer did not clear (check) the gun before handling it.
4) There was a nut loose on the trigger.

How "convenient" it happened "just one day" after our President's speech. Hmmm.


[This message has been edited by Dennis (edited 02-08-99).]
 
A few days ago a Bernalillo Co. (Albuquerque, NM) deputy was showing a .40S&W pistol to another deputy while they were at work at the county courthouse (for the purpose of selling the weapon). Well there was an "accidental" discharge according to the news. Luckily no one was shot.
 
Some prank. This is frustrating. Politicians who are not supported by facts resort to anecdotes like this.
 
Sadly, in both the gun show and the case of the two deputies, discharge would have been avoided if ANYONE had checked the weapon.

At my last trip to my favorite gun shop, I witnessed a pistol being handed from behind the counter to an undercover narcotics officer. The gun was checked three times: once before the clerk handed her the weapon, once when she accepted it, and again by the clerk when the gun was returned. There was no way that particular gun was going to fire, and all because people followed the cardinal rule of gun safety: Until YOU check it, it's loaded.
 
Have you ever noticed what incredible timing a severe case of "Stupid" has? Makes you wonder doesn't it?
 
Back
Top