You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Another Citizen's Arrest incident
- Thread starter TheeBadOne
- Start date
IZinterrogator
New member
After looking at that guy's website home page to understand what he was blabbing about at the top of the page, I feel like donating to the JPFO for penance. What a creep.
As for the citizen's arrest thing, I need more facts to make a call one way or another. The warrant said that his driveway and surrounding undeveloped property could be searched, so as long as the officers didn't go inside, they were following the warrant. This guy should take his beef up with the judge that issued the warrant, not the cops who had to serve it or the chief of police who has to go by the judge's ruling.
As for the citizen's arrest thing, I need more facts to make a call one way or another. The warrant said that his driveway and surrounding undeveloped property could be searched, so as long as the officers didn't go inside, they were following the warrant. This guy should take his beef up with the judge that issued the warrant, not the cops who had to serve it or the chief of police who has to go by the judge's ruling.
I agree with IZinterrogator,
"On April 6, 2005 City of Simi Valley police entered our founder's property with no announcment or search warrant and started removing his automobiles. He told the trespassers that they were under citizen's arrest and when he tried to call 911 he was assaulted. When he asked for receipts for his property before anyone left, he was served a malicously procured search warrant instead. "
When I read somthing like this, I normaly think that the cops diddnt hit the criminal hard enough. But with only one side and you dont know why the $100,000 worth of property was taken other than it was stolen property, but then again you have only one side.
With this kind of argument and only one side, "The guilty party side" wether there guilty or not, your waisting your time reading this thread.
"On April 6, 2005 City of Simi Valley police entered our founder's property with no announcment or search warrant and started removing his automobiles. He told the trespassers that they were under citizen's arrest and when he tried to call 911 he was assaulted. When he asked for receipts for his property before anyone left, he was served a malicously procured search warrant instead. "
When I read somthing like this, I normaly think that the cops diddnt hit the criminal hard enough. But with only one side and you dont know why the $100,000 worth of property was taken other than it was stolen property, but then again you have only one side.
With this kind of argument and only one side, "The guilty party side" wether there guilty or not, your waisting your time reading this thread.
MicroBalrog
New member
Ew. Ew. Ew.
One thing though: Natan Sharansky is very likely a former KGB informer, that much is true. Everything else on that site: :barf: :barf: :barf:
One thing though: Natan Sharansky is very likely a former KGB informer, that much is true. Everything else on that site: :barf: :barf: :barf: