Animal libber's harassment/blackmail attempt backfires

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Andy Feyen is the owner/operator of a small business situated in a northern suburb of Adelaide.

Andy is a non shooter and not a member of the Sporting Shooters Association of Australia.
Andy supports the RSPCA. He also supports those SSAA members who participate in the culling of feral animals in the State of South Australia.

Andy's business placed a small ad on the website of SSAA (SA) Inc advertising his ability to service dry cell batteries which are used in hand held radios and mobile phones. Equipment used by hunters when in the field.

Back in December 1999 Andy received the following email from a well known Animal Liberationist female who works for the Adelaide eastern suburbs City of Burnside.


----- Original Message -----
From: <deleted by SSAA@burnside.sa.gov.au>
To: <batterybloke@mpx.com.au>
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 1999 12:31 AM
Subject: advertising
It has come to my attention that your company is directing its advertising towards a sporting shooters organisation. I have ethical concerns with such a group and accordingly, when our field staff need to renew batteries, I will make a point of not dealing with your company. I ask you to reconsider the ethical implications attached to advertising indiscriminantly. (sic)

---------------------------------------------

Andy received other emails from another well known Animal Liberationist which is along a similiar line as the above item.

Channel Seven's Political Reporter Mike Smithson interviewed Andy at his business premises today and this evening the story was told. State Liberal MP Peter Lewis also commented on this outrageous abuse of position by a paid public servant.

Transcript
Station: CHANNEL 7 Date: 11/04/2000
Program: SEVEN NEWS Time: 06:13 PM
Compere: JANE DOYLE/GRAEME GOODINGS
Summary ID: A00000874320
Item: E-MAIL HARASSMENT IN RELATION TO BUSINESS ADVERTISING WITH THE SPORTING SHOOTERS ASSOCIATION.
INTV: ANDY FENYN, "THE BATTERY BLOKE"; GREG DODD, SPORTING SHOOTERS ASSOCIATION; PETER LEWIS, LIBERAL MP.
 
NEWSREADER: A Prospect retailer is outraged by what he claims is Internet harassment by a senior officer at Burnside Council. She sent him an e-mail warning he'd lose council business unless he stopped advertising with the Sporting Shooters Association.
[ Prospect ]

REPORTER: Andy Fenyn sells and repacks battery casings used by sporting shooters in their radio equipment, offering discounts in his advertisements.

He was outraged when he received an e-mail from a Wendy Parsons at Burnside Council. She expressed ethical concerns with sporting shooters, and said she would make a point of directing field staff not to buy from him.

ANDY FENYN: Well, it could a lot of damage to my business, especially in.. with the councils and the other Government departments that I deal with.

REPORTER: Wendy Parsons is a senior council clerical officer; she's also involved with Animal Liberation. Today, she confirmed using council e-mail facilities, but she denied sending the message on behalf of the council.
So, where does Burnside Council stand on using its ratepayer-funded e-mailing facilities for private use?

The Chief Officer said he was unaware of the situation, but took a dim view. Ms Parsons will be counselled (emphasis added -- should've been sacked) and the entire e-mail system will be reviewed.

The Sporting Shooters Association shares Andy's outrage.

GREG DODD: This is not.. really.. really not appreciated, this kind of activity.

REPORTER: MP Peter Lewis warns all businesses should be very wary of e-mail security.

PETER LEWIS: I'm very disturbed by it; it's dangerous, indeed.

REPORTER: Mike Smithson, Seven News.[/quote]

Finally, this from the Burnside Council:

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>---- Original Message -----
From: tbutcher@burnside.sa.gov.au
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 10:46 AM
Subject: Email policy

Thanks for your recent feedback. The council officer concerned was not speaking on behalf of council. Burnside Council does not encourage the personal use of its email facility, or any other council resource. Emailis a staff privilege, not a right. The officer has been censured. She has expressed deep regret and assured us that this type of action will not be repeated. We are currently reviewing our email policy in light of
the new Local Government Act introduced at the start of this year. The political affiliations of any private business are no concern of council and I can assure you that the battery supplier will not be disadvantaged in any way in his dealings with this council.

Regards
Tony Butcher
Communications Officer
City of Burnside
08-8366 4229
Website: www.burnside.sa.gov.au [/quote]


A small triumph for justice, to be sure, but at least it's a win for the good guys!

B
 
Ok Everyone you are going to FLame me to a crisp here.. but... WHAT THE HELL!!!!!!!!!
We have the right to boycott companies that go against what we believe but they can not do the same!? While we may not agree with this persons view, it is thier ight to believe what they will. If they decide not to buy from a company because of the companies stand on the RKBA then so be it. TO say otherwise is hipocritical in the extreem. And I for one think it is very bad for our cause. we are all free. We can all have differing opinions, and we all have to respect the opinions of others. If not then we are no better than them.
 
Kevinw,
Not gonna' flame ya man, but I do see the difference between a private citizen boycotting a private firm and a government office discriminating against a private company. My choice as a private citizen is just that, my choice. In a representitive democracy the government's choice should be based on the will of the people, not the will of one person who works in a government office. Of course, it's a little utopian to beleve that it does or will work like that, but that's the way it should be. My .02$

------------------
Tom Whitman
SSgt, USAF
 
Kevinw, I think a parallel would be that of a sheriff who will seek to arrest or harrass those whose actions are legal, but whose actions are against his personal beliefs.

It is outrageous--nay, evil--to use one's public political office to harm people due to one's personal political agenda. It is also a criminal offense--difficult to prove, usually, but still criminal.

I do hope you can distinguish between these two conditions of public vs. private.

Regards, Art

[This message has been edited by Art Eatman (edited April 13, 2000).]
 
ACK I missed something in the first reading, sorry. I thought it was a private company doing that. I was reading and trying to do tech calls :0 Ok so I went off half cocked. so sue me. =P
 
Back
Top