Andrew Coffee acquitted

S

Spats McGee

Administrator
On or about the same day that Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted, one Andrew Coffee IV was also acquitted. His charges included murder and attempted murder. I bring this up because there are some differences between this and the Rittenhouse case that raise some interesting questions.

  1. Mr. Coffee claimed SD as against deputies who were raiding his house.
  2. The murder charge (I believe) stemmed from the death of his girlfriend, who was shot 10 times in the crossfire.
  3. Mr. Coffee was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm.

Here are some internet articles:
https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/...n-5-counts-including-murder-attempted-murder/
https://reason.com/2021/11/22/man-faces-30-year-sentence-self-defense-andrew-coffee-iv-rittenhouse/
 
I read about this one. What crossed my mind is OK, a murder was committed and Coffee was found not guilty.

So, now the police who shot her will be charged with the murder... right?

/sarc
 
One of the points I want to make with this one is that even a felon-in-possession doesn't necessarily lose his right to SD.
 
One of the points I want to make with this one is that even a felon-in-possession doesn't necessarily lose his right to SD.
Click to expand...

I don't think this case actually proves that. He's facing 30 years.

FTA:
Coffee still faces 30 years in prison, because the jury found him guilty of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon—a firearm he used in self-defense when officers burst into his home for a drug raid that had nothing to do with him.
Click to expand...

As far as the 2nd part of the quote that the drug raid had nothing to do with him, that doesn't make sense. The drug raid was on the house he lived in, his father's. That doesn't make him a drug dealer, but it does mean he placed himself in jeopardy. I saw nothing showing that it was a mistake for the police to treat the father's house as a drug house. So he's a convicted felon, residing in a drug house, holding a gun. That's what he admitted to in court. That doesn't make him a murderer, but it doesn't mean he was wrongly accused. I think if this trial occurred at a different time, he might have been convicted of the causal death of his girlfriend. Either way, he's going to be doing real time.
 
seanc said:
I don't think this case actually proves that. He's facing 30 years.
Click to expand...
I disagree. He was acquitted of shooting at deputies based on self-defense. He was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Different issues.
seanc said:
....Either way, he's going to be doing real time.
Click to expand...
No question, but it was for the felon in possession charge, not for shooting at officers.
 
Understood.

This is another case where IF the po-po had been recording w/audio, it wouldn't be a hearsay argument in court. Either the cops came in announcing who they are and he'd be guilty of attempted murder of a police officer, or they didn't and he was clearly defending himself from armed intruders.
 
I agree that a recording of the incident might have cleared things up a bit. A trial might still have been necessary on some things, but it might have narrowed the issues.
 
seanc said:
Understood.

This is another case where IF the po-po had been recording w/audio, it wouldn't be a hearsay argument in court. Either the cops came in announcing who they are and he'd be guilty of attempted murder of a police officer, or they didn't and he was clearly defending himself from armed intruders.
Click to expand...
Anyone can yell, "Open up! Police!" There have been numerous reports of home invaders using that ploy to gain entry. It's not hard to buy police uniform clothing, and anyone can go on-line and order a badge that will look real enough through a door peephole or on a doorbell camera.

This is why I believe that no-knock and so-called "knock and announce" dynamic entries should be outlawed. There have been far too many cases of police smashing their way into the wrong house -- sometimes resulting in injury to or death of one or more residents, and occasionally resulting in injury to or death of a police officer. These days, I'm not willing to believe that someone standing on the porch hollering "POLICE!" are really the police.

I've even been a victim, in a very minor way. Some years ago, a couple with the same last name as mine lived about a mile down the street from me. My last name is not a common last name, like Smith or Jones.

One evening I was sitting at my computer and the telephone rang. I answered, and a voice on the other end said something like, "This is [___] police dispatch. Secure your dogs and let the officers into your house." Well, this was all news to me, because I had never owned a dog, and there were no police cars in my yard. Which I told the dispatcher in no uncertain terms. Of course -- the cops were at the house down the street, the other household with the same last name, but my town's sterling detectives couldn't figure out that the first telephone number listed for My Street under [Last Name] wasn't the right party just because the last name was the same.

It could have been worse -- they might have BEEN at my door even though they were looking for the other dude. It's a sobering thought.
 
This is why I believe that no-knock and so-called "knock and announce" dynamic entries should be outlawed.
Click to expand...

I don't think they should be outlawed. No statute is needed. They should be abandoned as a routine practice though.

What was the original point of the "no-knock"?? Supposedly to avoid giving dope dealers time to flush their stash. No evidience? No bust!

However, I think the reality is that it was done to allow the cops to bust people CHEAPLY. Doors are pretty cheap. Digging up a septic system and then having lab techs go through hundreds (or more) gallons of sewage to find the drugs isn't.

Because the dope doesn't magically disappear when its flushed. Any place with a septic system, its going to be right there. And any place connected to a municipal sewer system can be isolated from that system. IN ADVANCE of the bust. Of course, that also costs more money than a door. And it takes more work and advance planning than a "here's the address, go raid the place" does.

you can't flush a gun. You can't flush a lot of physical evidence, nor can you burn it and make it disappear. Traces will always remain. So, balance the "need for speed" in a police raid against the potential harm mistakes cause.

Lives, including innocent lives have been lost because of "O dark thirty no knock" police invasions, sometimes at the wrong address.

As far as I can see, the two "wars" America never had a chance of "winning" are the war on poverty and the war on drugs /war on crime. Bad generals, flawed battle plans and stupid tactics cancel out even the most brilliant and professional acts by the troops in the trenches.

Personally I feel we have taken the militarization of the police, and their "qualified immunity" too far, and society is paying the cost. Every day.

I can understand why so many people are angry. Doesn't give them a right to riot, loot and commit other crimes though. Two wrongs don't make it right.
 
I don't think they should be outlawed. No statute is needed. They should be abandoned as a routine practice though.
Click to expand...

Bad generals, flawed battle plans and stupid tactics cancel out even the most brilliant and professional acts by the troops in the trenches.
Click to expand...

The tactic has been overused and abused by the militarization of the police. The "defund the police" folks want to put a camera on every cop because they're convinced they're all criminals. I think it keeps everyone honest. The Chicago police were against bodycams until they found it severely limited the number of police brutality complaints. At the same time, it also eventually helped convict Jason Van Dyke of murder.

Qualified immunity is nowhere in the constitution. It's my understanding it was created out of whole cloth by judges. My idea of criminal justice reform is severely limiting qualified immunity, no-knock raids and civil forfeitures. These practices have become a corruption of justice.
 
For those of you that need a hero, here you go.

"The Sheriff's Office says the Coffee family has had a long history of violence against law enforcement. In December 2015, Deputy Chris Lester was shot by Andrew Coffee II, a "career criminal" who is still being held at the IRC jail.
Coffee III has been arrested more than 57 times, and his son, Coffee IV has been arrested more than 36 times. Both will be in first appearance at the Indian River County Jail on Monday morning

It was also revealed that the grandfather also previously shot a cop as well during a traffic stop."
 
I've read a couple of internet opinion pieces (yah, I know...) about this verdict and the Rittenhouse one. Seems those people only wanted to focus on how the Rittenhouse acquittal was huge national news and the Coffee acquittal was ignored by the media, because he was black.

Personally, I don't think it was because of his ethnicity, I think it was ignored because he's a career criminal from a family with a history of being career criminals.

I think the jury was right to acquit him of murder charges, and come down to it, without other evidence (such as a video) who shot first is a matter of who you believe, and I'm not upset at him being found not guilty for shooting at attackers who he "didn't know" were police.

The felon with a gun charge is a slam dunk. Guilty, no way around that. That's been the law since 1968.

Prior to 68 a convicted felon, who had served his entire sentence and was released having "paid for his crime" could possess a gun without breaking any laws just for having it. That hasn't been the case for over 50 years now.

What bothers me most is that the poor woman who was killed was reportedly asleep in her bed (and one report I saw said "in another room) and was hit by 10 bullets. TEN BULLETS HIT her. Almost certainly from the police, though I never saw where it was said none of them came from Coffee's gun. They just kind of left that out. No mention of Coffee being shot.

Ok, so its dark, you enter with a flash bang grenade, and then...someone shoots at you! Seems to me the police return fire was a bit beyond...indiscriminate...

And no fault was found with the police.....seems to me that ought to be changed. the officers apparently followed their training and police procedures so the "did nothing wrong" but it seems to me that ten hits on the wrong target ought not be ignored or approved of.

Anyone know how many rounds were fired in total??
 
As far as I can see, the two "wars" America never had a chance of "winning" are the war on poverty and the war on drugs /war on crime.
Click to expand...

They aren't wars, they're challenges that need to be managed. And you'd think that given our post-WWII record we'd come up with a better metaphor.
 
technology

One of the things that annoys me is "the police weren't recording", or, "the lack of audio in the recording". The implication frequently being that the police are trying to hide something.

Maybe,.......... but my experience with body and car cams is that sometimes, the gear just plain doesn't work, or at least, work like it should. Ever not have a cell signal or drop a call? Technology is not foolproof. But the lack of police recordings these days is frequently an indictment on the agency or the officer or both.
 
Maybe some of you are old enough to remember when computers weren't 100% completely dependable...oh, wait, they still aren't. :rolleyes:

Some of the things I learned in the early days of home PC's were that "fully compatible" meant "probably will work" and that if a program didn't run right the software company would say its a computer problem and the computer company would say "its a software problem".....

Its better today, but its not perfect. Today it seems that "update" is code for "screws up what you like and use and adds tons of crap you don't want and won't use"

I might be wrong but that seem to be the case most of the time. :D
 
One of the things that annoys me is "the police weren't recording", or, "the lack of audio in the recording". The implication frequently being that the police are trying to hide something.
Click to expand...

I've said this before, I'd like my elected officials to wear body cams so we could monitor what they are up to. Gosh that is a GREAT idea.
 
One of the points I want to make with this one is that even a felon-in-possession doesn't necessarily lose his right to SD.
Click to expand...

This is a good point.

Here is another similar case from years gone by...
https://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=146183&highlight=charged+self+defense+new+york

We have seen several rulings similar to this over the years, not necessarily with felons, but of people who had guns illegally (e.g., Chicago, New York, D.C.) who used them in self defense and (usually) were not charged in the shootings, but were charged for possession.

https://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70414&highlight=charged+self+defense
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top