A brief skim of listed comments does not show anything on the following, so I will take a chance. Should I be beating a dead horse, sorry about that.
Re it's keeping a record of NICS checks, "for audit purposes" it claims, The FBI is flatly in violation of existing federal law. Funny situation, for a "law enforcement agency" to be in, no? As usual, one seen the fine hand of Clinton-Reno et al in the foregoing.
It remains however, that a publically funded law enforcement agency is operating in blatant violation of the law. It also seems that The Congress (House and Senate), as usual, have turned a blind eye to this illegal activity by a government agency, as well as ignoring their constitutional oversight responsibility.
I think I have said enough on this. What do readers have to say, if anything, and more interesting than that is, what have readers had to say to their "elected things"?
Re it's keeping a record of NICS checks, "for audit purposes" it claims, The FBI is flatly in violation of existing federal law. Funny situation, for a "law enforcement agency" to be in, no? As usual, one seen the fine hand of Clinton-Reno et al in the foregoing.
It remains however, that a publically funded law enforcement agency is operating in blatant violation of the law. It also seems that The Congress (House and Senate), as usual, have turned a blind eye to this illegal activity by a government agency, as well as ignoring their constitutional oversight responsibility.
I think I have said enough on this. What do readers have to say, if anything, and more interesting than that is, what have readers had to say to their "elected things"?