MIT in the 22nd Century?
I seem to remember that MIT has had problems keeping it's fraternaties from literally drinking themselves to death.
And MIT's idea of dealing with the homeless and recycling is a $0.05 deposit system for pop cans and bottles that they leave littered all over the campus for the 'bums' to pick up. (This was told to me, in all cander, during a presentation of an economic model of current recycling techniques.)
MIT - "We know more about everything than you do... so how do you get this thing to work again?"
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Statistically, chances are higher (in the US) to die from a gun "accident" then a really planned (criminal) use of a gun... [/quote]
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>In Boston at the MIT I felt like being in the 22 century already. Everybody peaceful, friendly and unarmed. [/quote]
Uhh... MIT still has a competition shooting club.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>First of all, if you want a gun then prove that you are mentally capable of judging the effects of the gun. [/quote]
'Scuse me Mate, but didn't Olde King George decree that all signers of the Declaration of Independance were dangerously lacking in mental temperment? (or some such wording)
Exactly which statistics are you refering to, to ones that NEJM rescinded?
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>So no gun for those people either. [/quote]
Oh, (yeah, it took me awhile to see this one) very hostile line, which apparently has no purpose other than to troll...
Over and out
------------------
~USP
"[Even if there would be] few tears shed if and when the Second Amendment is held to guarantee nothing more than the state National Guard, this would simply show that the Founders were right when they feared that some future generation might wish to abandon liberties that they considered essential, and so sought to protect those liberties in a Bill of Rights. We may tolerate the abridgement of property rights and the elimination of a right to bear arms; but we should not pretend that these are not reductions of rights." -- Justice Scalia 1998
I seem to remember that MIT has had problems keeping it's fraternaties from literally drinking themselves to death.
And MIT's idea of dealing with the homeless and recycling is a $0.05 deposit system for pop cans and bottles that they leave littered all over the campus for the 'bums' to pick up. (This was told to me, in all cander, during a presentation of an economic model of current recycling techniques.)
MIT - "We know more about everything than you do... so how do you get this thing to work again?"
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Statistically, chances are higher (in the US) to die from a gun "accident" then a really planned (criminal) use of a gun... [/quote]
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>In Boston at the MIT I felt like being in the 22 century already. Everybody peaceful, friendly and unarmed. [/quote]
Uhh... MIT still has a competition shooting club.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>First of all, if you want a gun then prove that you are mentally capable of judging the effects of the gun. [/quote]
'Scuse me Mate, but didn't Olde King George decree that all signers of the Declaration of Independance were dangerously lacking in mental temperment? (or some such wording)
Exactly which statistics are you refering to, to ones that NEJM rescinded?
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>So no gun for those people either. [/quote]
Oh, (yeah, it took me awhile to see this one) very hostile line, which apparently has no purpose other than to troll...
Over and out
------------------
~USP
"[Even if there would be] few tears shed if and when the Second Amendment is held to guarantee nothing more than the state National Guard, this would simply show that the Founders were right when they feared that some future generation might wish to abandon liberties that they considered essential, and so sought to protect those liberties in a Bill of Rights. We may tolerate the abridgement of property rights and the elimination of a right to bear arms; but we should not pretend that these are not reductions of rights." -- Justice Scalia 1998