Nightcrawler
New member
The only pistol I've fired to date was a Charles Daly 1911 clone. I had some problems with it, but I liked the trigger. It had a nice trigger, with little to no slack in it. (a not too gun-saavy friend described it as a hair trigger) Ever since my experience with that pistol, I've had little tolerance for firearms with creep, slack, or play in the trigger. For instance:
My Winchester 94: Has slack in the trigger that serves no purpose that I can see. I live with it, but don't like it.
I handled a military M9 (Beretta 92) in the guards. While the DA trigger pull was buttery smooth, the SA trigger pull was mushy compared to my 1911. Are all DA autos like this?
So, are my standards too high? I mean, the CD was kind of a "budget" 1911 clone, but it had a nice crisp trigger on it, and I more or less expect that from all my firearms, now.
My Winchester 94: Has slack in the trigger that serves no purpose that I can see. I live with it, but don't like it.
I handled a military M9 (Beretta 92) in the guards. While the DA trigger pull was buttery smooth, the SA trigger pull was mushy compared to my 1911. Are all DA autos like this?
So, are my standards too high? I mean, the CD was kind of a "budget" 1911 clone, but it had a nice crisp trigger on it, and I more or less expect that from all my firearms, now.