Al-Qaeda seeking nukes.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Greg Bell

New member
Al Qaeda seeking nuclear kit for attacks: UK official
Mon Nov 13, 2006 2:38 PM ET

By Sophie Walker

LONDON (Reuters) - Al Qaeda is trying to acquire the technology that would enable it to use a nuclear device to attack Western targets including Britain, a senior British official said on Monday.

"We know the aspiration is there. We know attempts to gather materials are there, we know that attempts to gather technology are there," the senior Foreign Office official told reporters.

The comments at a briefing came days after the head of Britain's domestic spy agency said Muslim extremists were plotting at least 30 major terrorist attacks in Britain which could involve chemical and nuclear devices.

The Foreign Office official, asked whether there was any doubt that Al Qaeda wants to gather nuclear material for use against Western targets, said: "No doubt at all."

Eliza Manningham-Buller, head of intelligence agency MI5, said last week young British Muslims were being groomed to become suicide bombers and her agents were tracking some 1,600 suspects, most of whom were British-born and linked to al Qaeda in Pakistan.

Britain suffered its worst peacetime attack in July 2005 when four British Islamists blew themselves up on London's transport network, killing 52 commuters and wounding hundreds.

Earlier this month Dhiren Barot, 34, was jailed for a minimum of 40 years for plotting to blow up the New York Stock Exchange and carry out attacks in Britain with gas-filled limousines and a "dirty bomb".

Evidence against him included copious research into explosives, chemicals and radioactive materials.

In a separate ongoing terrorism trial, prosecutors say one of the suspects had told police in an interview that his superior in a Pakistan training camp had asked him to help contact the Russian mafia about buying a nuclear bomb.

However Salahuddin Amin, who is accused of plotting conventional bomb attacks in the UK using ammonium nitrate fertilizer, said he did not believe it was a genuine plot and nothing appeared to have developed from the plan.

British Prime Minister Tony Blair will focus on the fight against terrorism when he unveils the last package of laws of his premiership in a program to be read to Wednesday by Queen Elizabeth.Qa
 
Are you kidding???

The Foreign Office official, asked whether there was any doubt that Al Qaeda wants to gather nuclear material for use against Western targets, said: "No doubt at all."

This guy has to be the most clever man in all of history! Who else would have figured that out?:rolleyes:
 
News Flash!

I also am seeking nukes. :D

I would like 3 - 4, low yeild devices, preferably man or pickup truck portable.

I have about $40, US per item. PM me with availibilty.
 
I would also like a low yield tactical nuclear weapon suitable for blackmailing and threatening various foreign powers that I think should be taken down a notch. I have a standing offer of twelve hundred bucks and some pocket lint.

Alert the presses! :rolleyes:

When millions of Americans disappear in a mushroom cloud, remember how you didn't want to be inconvenienced

I expected better of you. I'd rather die in a nuke attack than end up living in a world where my freedoms have been chipped away down to nothing.
 
When millions of Americans disappear in a mushroom cloud, remember how you didn't want to be inconvenienced

The America I know is more likely to disappear under oppresive legislation, passed for the good of the Homeland.
 
Why nukes? a radioactive dirty bomb would be a more effective terror weapon. Think of one going off in a crowded metropolis. Not only would it cause economic damage due to the decontamination that would be needed but think about the fear caused by the delayed effect of the radiation years down the road. The radioactive material can be had from any hospital in the United States. The materials to make it can also be purchased in the US.

Or I would be eyeballing all the chemical trucks/cars on the US highways and rails. Look at all the oil refineries that could be targets causing damage to our economy. Not to mention chemical plants ripe for the plucking.

I would say they are crazy and there are a few that might set of a small tactical nuclear device. However, the hunt would then be on by us and the rest of the world. The point is to instill fear not rage.
 
dirty bomb, shmirty bomb

If I wanted one of those... 2 cases of budweiser, 3 bottle of crown royale...and 15 minutes with Mandy, the local ER nurse. :rolleyes:

I want one of those purple mushroon cloud devices. Actually, I want 4 of them.

One...I'll threaten to detontate, on the 4th of July, and actually do it. Offshore, and underwater...to make the wildest surf the SE Us has seen. :rolleyes:

The rest, I would keep in my garage. I would show them to my buddies.

Edit: It would kinda suck, to never go to my garage again. Not to mention the iodine supplements daily.
 
Hurray for an obvious news article. Since when would a terrorist organization not want the most powerful kind of bomb in existence? I don't know why an article was even written about this, it's nothing new.

And BTW:
What happened to the, "millions of Americans" post? Are posts being deleted?
No, it's in the signature line of the original post.
 
Al-Qaeda seeking nukes

Al-Qaeda nukes...
That would be "interesting" to see what government facilllity oor city the would blow up. The next "interesting" question would be how long it would take to eleminate our oill supply by nuking/blowing every islomic nation off the map.
 
What would be funny is the headline
"100's of Terrorist dead today in a accidental activation of a nuclear device sources say there is nothing left"
But we all know who would get the blame for a nuke going off and a bunch of terrorist dead.

U.S.A
 
I would say they are crazy and there are a few that might set of a small tactical nuclear device. However, the hunt would then be on by us and the rest of the world. The point is to instill fear not rage.

It would lead to the death of millions of Muslims via large nuclear devices.
 
Must be a slow news day. Maybe tomorrow we we have a more timely and breathtaking headline like.....

"BREAKING ARABS AND JEWS AT EACH OTHERS THROATS, MIDEAST IN TURMOIL" film at eleven. Of course that headline has been running for thousands of years but I digress.
 
Iran announced today that their nuclear program is nearly complete. Add to that the fact that the international Atomic Energy experts have found unexplained plutonium and highly enriched uranium traces in a nuclear waste facility in Iran and you likely have Islamic fundamentalist H-Bombs within the next half-decade.

Our only hope now is that the Israelis are strong enough to protect us from ourselves. Hopefully, the Israelis, who maybe aren't silly enough to convince themselves that this is an academic exercise, will attack Iran immediately.

As soon as this happens, and it will happen, all of this discussion of rights for enemy combatants, wire-taps, torture, etc will seem quaint and stupefyingly short-sighted.

atomic%20explosion%20-%201.jpg
 
Are..

Are you for real?

Do you have a solution, instead of just OHNOES NUKES? Any substance beyond 'Stop dissenting about rights. Those of you who dissent from true-think must want nuclear weapons to be used against American cities.'?

Is this also the fault of anyone who voted third party?
 
Is this also the fault of anyone who voted third party?

I have been informed by the moderator that my opinion on the elections, and its attendant tone, are no longer allowed. So, you might think that, I couldn't possibly comment.
 
I just looked at a few of your blog postings and find them well.............right on the money. Wiretaps that bipartisan presidents used before Bush, before nuclear terror, are now somehow a violation of rights. Past Presidents have read private mail, tapped phone lines, and put innocent civilians in internment camps for the good of the country. Now Demoncrats and Independents find these practices unconstitutional......why????????Political gain!!!!!!! Instead of uniting to fight the people who are trying to kill us, they seize any and all means to defeat a greater enemy......G.W. Bush.

I think you are right. I think that Demoncrats and Independents will be the first in line to blame others if an attack happens.

You are right no matter who may disagree. History says so if not the liberal courts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top