(AK) Pastor who justifiably shot 2 intruders facing wrongful death suit

spacemanspiff

New member
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/stor...p-6259578c.html

Victim's mother sues pastor who shot him
BIG LAKE: Mielke knew he wasn't threatened by burglars, lawyer says.
By ZAZ HOLLANDER
Anchorage Daily News
Published: April 15th, 2005
Last Modified: April 15th, 2005 at 04:47 AM

The Rev. Phillip Mielke shot Chris Palmer and Frank Jones outside the Big Lake Community Chapel two years ago as the pair burglarized a food bank in the church basement.

Palmer, a 31-year-old father of three boys who battled drug and alcohol addiction, died in a ditch near the church.

Jones, a 23-year-old with a checkered past, bled to death on a friend's mattress several hours later.

A jury later in 2003 found Mielke not guilty of manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide.

Now Jones' mother wants to bring the 46-year-old Mielke back to court to face a wrongful death lawsuit her attorney filed in Palmer Superior Court.

The lawsuit, filed Wednesday on behalf of Nevada resident Bonnie Pigott, charges that Mielke breached his duty to use "reasonable care in the firing of the handgun." It asks for more than $100,000 in damages, plus fees.

Pigott, who goes by the first name Rachael, could not be reached Thursday.

Her attorney, Eric Jensen of Wasilla, explained why she filed the suit.

"Her boy was shot in the back by a guy who knew he was shooting at somebody's back and was not threatened in any way at any time," Jensen said.

Mielke, contacted at the church Thursday, said he had no comment and would not identify his attorney.

The pastor shot Palmer in the lower back just after 5 a.m. April 24, 2003, as Palmer emerged from the basement of the church, a trim red building on Big Lake Road with a small but loyal local congregation.

Firing through a church window, Mielke then shot Jones in the back and heel as he fled to his car, parked nearby. Jones drove to Palmer's girlfriend's house on a back road a few miles away. He died there about four hours later.

Mielke told Alaska State Troopers that he rushed to the church with his .44-caliber handgun after hearing the men on an intercom wired to his home across the road. Standing at the top of the stairs in the dark with the men coming up at him, Mielke said, he was "scared to death."

Investigators later said they found folding knives in both men's pockets and a loaded .357 magnum in the basement.

The distinctly Alaska case -- a pistol-packing pastor avenging the burglary of his church -- generated significant local interest.

Many, including the jurors, backed Mielke's decision to protect his territory, a church founded by his family.

It also resonated among some Christians, who wondered whether Mielke violated larger biblical prohibition on murder and teachings on turning the other cheek.

Pigott came to Alaska in mid-May 2003 after the shootings, she said during an interview two years ago. She met Palmer's girlfriend -- June Benedix -- at the Wasilla Wal-Mart. She visited the church. She saw the mattress at Benedix's Big Lake home, "nothing more than a shack," Pigott said.

"When he got there, he didn't want her to leave," she said. "He begged her to stay there and lay by him because he knew he was going to die. She went to find a phone, called against his wishes. By the time they got there, he was dead."

Jones had several earlier arrests on his record, including 2001 assault and kidnapping charges dismissed the next year after he pleaded no contest, according to a database of state records.

Pigott acknowledged that the man she called "Sonny" who loved her lasagna was no saint. But, she said, her son didn't deserve to die the way he did.

A relative of Palmer's said the family has no plans to file a lawsuit.

Mielke has 20 days to respond to Pigott's suit.

Two years ago, the Palmer district attorney's office had to prove the pastor's guilt "beyond a reasonable doubt." Here, Jensen said, he simply has to prove guilt by a "preponderance of the evidence."

Any trial is still a year off, he said.

Reporter Zaz Hollander can be reached in Wasilla at zhollander@adn.com or at 1-907-352-6711.
 
...."loved her lasagna"???? Does the fact that he ate Italian food make him innocent?

They found knives and a loaded .357. If it weren't for that bit of information, I'd wonder whether the reverend had the right to fire (both were shot in the back, which never looks good), but with weapons like that on the scene, and not knowing the rest of the case, I'd say he's good to preach on Sunday.
 
Civil trial...be afraid. It happened to O.J. Course he was guilty in the criminal trial but slipped off the scale of justice. :mad:
 
This is very unfortunate but the good Rev. Mielke is in a perfect position for a counter suit. Which he will in all likelyhood easly win. But probably never collect a dime.
 
1. it was the scumbags choice to commit a crime.
2. it was the scumbags choice to not comply with the pastors orders to 'Stop' when confronted in a confined area.
3. it was the scumbags choice to rush towards the pastor.
4. medical experts testified that the bullets entered from the side.
5. firearm experts testified that the shots were fired from 2 feet.
6. it was the scumbag jones choice to not seek medical attention, but rather go to a friends home, where he bled out 7 hours later.

seven hours. think about that.
 
He is a Reverend, which should help him. US tort laws do scare me though. Particularly if the Jury think there is an insurance company somewhere.
 
Come on spiffy you being an insurance maven, ya know how the system works....choices or no choices it was a crappy shoot and the good Rev lucked out in the criminal trial...he aint gonna be lucky civilly

Wildworthafew$$Alaska
 
and what type of insurance policy would be pursued in such a civil suit?

i'm fairly certain that the churches liability insurance (if he had any that is) would exclude such an occurrence. his homeowners insurance would likely cover only his home, and since he was in the church at the time, would not be covered.


following is an excerpt from an ADN article printed during june 2003:
Rachael Pigott, mother of Frank Jones, said in telephone interviews this week that she hopes the pastor does time in prison on charges of manslaugher, if not murder.

"This pastor cannot get away with this. This is crazy," Pigott said. "There's just no words for it. A pastor is supposed to say 'Take what you need if you need it.' If you ask them for a shirt, they're supposed to offer you a coat.

"Why didn't he just call the police?"

A teacher's aide who is currently unemployed, Pigott traveled from her home in Sacramento, Calif., to Alaska last month to see the place where her son died. In mid-May, a friend drove her to the chapel, she said.

Pigott walked inside and saw a man standing there.

"I asked him if he was the man who shot my son," she said. "He said, yes, he was."

Then, Pigott said, Mielke ushered her to the stairs and told her that's where he shot the men.

"He said they were stealing food out of the food bank downstairs," Pigott said. "I said, 'You shot them for taking food?'

"He said he was scared for his life."

Pigott said she asked whether the two men had guns. Mielke said he didn't see any, she said.

Wade on Thursday also said that Mielke never saw any weapons.

Palmer, 31, was found dead in a ditch near the church. Troopers responding to a 911 call at a nearby home found 23-year-old Jones dead around noon the same day.

Jones died of multiple gunshot wounds suffered at 5:30 a.m., according to a death certificate signed by deputy medical examiner Susan Klingler and provided to the Daily News by Pigott.

i dont think this gold digger will get any money.
 
Now now Spiffy yer gettin way too emotional....the liability policy always covers neglignece of the insurred....and

Assuming for purposes of argument the Plaintiffas lawyer has half a brain, hes gonna sue causes of action based on negligence AND intentional action, triggering a conflict of interest between the pastors liability insurer and the pastor...becasue of that conflict of interest, the insurance company is going to be compelled to PAY FOR the pastors personal attorney...it thus becomes cheaper to toss money to the plaintiff....so see below for further considerations

On the plaintiffs side, ya got a 23 year old with a crappy work history (i assume), no dependents that can claim loss of support...so ya got the issue of consious pain and suffering as the creep bled out vis a vis the deceaseds own wrongful conduct, ya got unsympathetic jurrors here in Alaska, but you know you can beat summary judgement no matter what and you can run it on the insurance comapnies nickel for a year or two and blow up the fees, on the other hand, if ya win on the negligence cause and get a verdict in excess of the policy Pastor goes bankrupt and ya wasted your time, if ya win on the intentional claim pastor takes the hit but the insurance comapny wont pay....taking all of the foregoing into account, both parties will probably settle after the Pastors deposition...

If Im plaintiff, im looking for a mill, realistically the insurance company will toss 100K, Id look at about 200K as the total settlement paid on a structure which will cost the insurance company maybe 65K..that about equals their legal fee exposure...




WildletmeknowificanhelpyafurtherAlaska
 
In 2003, she lived in CA. Now she lives in NV. How was her support cut off when her dirtbag son died? Why does she need $100K+?

Wait, California... I get it. Never mind.

(Save the flames, I'm from San Diego.)
 
A jury later in 2003 found Mielke not guilty of manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide.

The lawsuit, filed Wednesday on behalf of Nevada resident Bonnie Pigott, charges that Mielke breached his duty to use "reasonable care in the firing of the handgun." It asks for more than $100,000 in damages, plus fees.

Her attorney, Eric Jensen of Wasilla, explained why she filed the suit.
"Her boy was shot in the back by a guy who knew he was shooting at somebody's back and was not threatened in any way at any time," Jensen said.

A jury already cleared Mielke on this very issue. This legal perversion amounts to being tried twice for the same alleged offense.
 
Counter-Punch

First: The court in the Wrongful Death action will take 'judicial notice' of the previous acquittal on manslaughter etc. and that will no doubt be of some help.

Second: Burglary is, under the law, an 'inherently dangerous felony' in which the occupant of the burglarized premises is usually treated by the courts as presumed to be under an imminent threat.

Third: The reverend should answer the wrongful death lawsuit with a counter-suit of his own, claiming that the mother was 'negligent' in raising her son such that he had a history of substance abuse, couldn't hold on to a job, and completely abrogated his responsibility to his own children when he made the career choice of being a thief and burglar. If he had better values ingrained in him growing up he would never have engaged in committing an 'inherently dangerous felony' in the first place. Mom certainly had years and years with her son to teach him right from wrong. Perhaps a better upbringing could have avoided this tragedy.
 
Despite this (and despite my wife's objections) I'd still rather live in Alaska. This site needs a job forum. Anybody hiring armed health insurance educators in Alaska? My resume is waiting!

Seriously - you're going to run into litigious whiners in any state, even beautiful (and otherwise level-headed) AK. That being said ... Note to self: don't shoot intruder in the back...
 
Back
Top