Advocacy: need a critique

Derek Zeanah

New member
I get upset sometimes, and I tend to get long-winded. Drafted this reply in another forum, and wanted to know if it makes my point well.

Feel like I'm not as objective as I could be here... :(
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>
Wow. I've been here all of 2 minutes and I've already found something I need to respond to. :(

>You all make our country dangerous. YOU ARE DANGEROUS!!
>You are nothing but a bunch of rednecks with guns.

If I didn't know better I'd think you are basing your worldview on Walker, Texas Ranger episodes. <g> I live in the South, but I'm far from being a redneck (or liking the music).

>Here's news...You are the MINORITY in this cointry now.
>Most of us live in cities,

Correct for spelling and this is probably true, unfortunately.

>can read and write

Actually, I've got a BA in history and scored 98th percentile on the LSAT; my wife is two years away from her MD (which means five years away from a real income, unfortunately). I've been self employed as a professional photographer in the past, though now I'm looking for a computer-support job (I'm an MCSE too) in a new city (we're closing on our second house in two days).

Not quite illiterate.

>and we don't need you or your guns and we are going
>to out vote you.

Actually, I think you do. If you really believed this then you would be lobbying to have police disarmed -- after all, they're less educated than your average gun owner (look it up -- Lott's book has the numbers, and you can make a "common sense" argument that goes something like "why else would someone put up with that level of bureaucratic BS *and* get shot at for *only* $7.20 per hour?"), and are something like 11 times *more* likely to shoot an innocent person by mistake than an armed citizen (check the DOJ statistics).

>Pretty soon you will not be allowed on the street with
>those pick up trucks or SUV's

Nice try -- I drive a diesel powered VW that gets 53 MPG. Your point?

>and we already stopped your cigarette's

Have never smoked, and won't eat in a restaurant without a no-smoking section.

>and soon we will stop those guns and I think we ought to
>ban cowboy boots too because you all think that you are
>some kind of John Wayne when you wear them.

Go back and look at your post again. You're saying that *I'm* bigoted?

>God. To think you people actually have guns is frightening
>but you won't be frightening for long. You will soon be >outlawed and It can't happen too soon for me. We will
>have a special prison for all of you nut cases. I think
>we'll fence Oklahoma and put all of you in there and
>let you kill each other off. HA! Good Riddance if you
>ask me. You are nothing but redneck , trailer park trash
>anyway and no one will even miss you.

Re-read your post again, and try and read the following comments objectively (not that I actually expect a response here):

People like you scare me, and I'm afraid that you *are* in danger of becoming a majority in this country. You're scared, but you don't understand what's scaring you or why. The world is (and has always been) a scary place, and you're doing your part to try and make it more friendly. But you don't have the sense to see the consequences of your actions.

It sounds like you're willing to give up most or all of your personal freedoms (for purposes of this discussion this includes everything listed in the Bill of Rights, plus personal privacy) for the promise of less fear in the future, *and you're willing to take my rights as well!*

I believe we live in the greatest country on earth (and I've lived in Germany and Brasil also, so I have some idea what I'm talking about here). I believe the Constitution is the reason why we're so well off, and I was pleased to pledge my life in the defense of this document ("against all enemies, foreign and domestic...").

You're scared of me for reasons that you can't voice or comprehend. It may be that the concept of freedom itself scares you, and that's OK -- the idea that a man is totally responsible for his own success or failure in life is a terrifying concept to some, and many (most?) are more comfortable with the title of "serf" or "subject" than they are with the title of "free man." Serfs don't have any real freedoms, but they know that the nobility is obligated to keep them fed and provide for their defense (as they are never trusted with arms.)

You're scared of me because I'm not like you. You're scared because I am *free*, and because I demand that those freedoms remain protected. I'm smart, educated, unimpressed with current political trends, and am unwilling to compromise with regard to my rights and those of my descendents. You're scared of me because you never served in the military, and the oath of enlistment that I took so seriously frightens you. You're scared of me because instead of your phobias regarding firearms, I train regularly. You're scared of me because I *like* owning a semi-automatic rifle capable of killing a moose, and that I can keep my rounds within an eight-inch circle at 400 meters.

You're scared of me because you don't understand me. I'm really easy to understand though, and it won't cost you a thing. Simply read the following:
1) Constitution: http://www.house.gov/Constitution/Constitution.html
2) Declaration of Independence: http://www.house.gov/house/Declaration.html
3) The Federalist Papers (note that these were the guys who wanted a strong federal government, and they had to sell it *hard* to get the people to agree): http://lcweb2.loc.gov/const/fed/fedpapers.html

Might as well go ahead and read the anti-federalist papers too, just for balance: http://odur.let.rug.nl/~usa/D/1776-1800/federalist/antixx.htm

To you, these are boring words written by dead white guys. To me, they're wonderful guidance, and rank not far below the Qur-an and the Bible. Of course, those books might scare you as well. :(
[/quote]


[This message has been edited by dzeanah (edited May 28, 2000).]
 
Great reply but I'm afraid you're trying to teach a pig to sing! ;) On the other hand, your views may be appreciated by some innocent bystanders.

You kind of grind the other person into the dust. Some may take offense at that but the speaker so richly deserves it! :D

I neither expect nor request you fight for our RKBA exactly as I might (at any given moment). Your reply, in my opinion, is right on the money.

You've got my vote!
 
dzeanah, it is a good post, IMHO.

Personally, I would suggest not responding to every one of her absurd points (I recognize her words as coming from the MMM discussion forum). For example, cigarettes? Wow. They're coming for our hamburgers next.

When you respond to a post such as hers, I would respectfully suggest that you respond by realizing that you are actually speaking to others that are reading both of your posts. That is, you won't change this woman's mind ... assume she is lost to reality. Instead, you will artfully highlight her lack of logic, and her embrace of fascism to 'solve' the 'problem' of gun owners.

I try to eliminate sarcasm from my arguments, and I try to avoid attacking when my freedom is attacked. I don't do as well on either count as I would like, but I'm still learning. One thing that has helped me recently is something called the 'Five Minutes to Freedom' - a handy, and practical guide to RKBA activism (Rich says he'll post it in the TFL library ... right now, find it at http://hometown.aol.com/jaspar/myhomepage/writing.html ). For example:

"DON'T MESS WITH TRUE BELIEVERS. In the time you spend trying to convert one hard core antigun person to our side, you could have gone out and motivated and organized 20 people who already think like you do. Go with the flow. It's easier on your nerves, and much more effective. Personally, I have converted several anti-rights true believers, but never again! Lots of NRA members are not registered voters. A lot of gun owners aren't NRA members. Even more folks have no idea of their elected officials' positions on gun issues. Where is your time most effectively spent? Think about this before you spend an hour writing a clever response to a silly message you found somewhere on the internet."

Take care. Regards from AZ



[This message has been edited by Jeff Thomas (edited May 28, 2000).]
 
Thanks, guys. Posted it, then re-posted when I found out their BB software strips the '>' characters from posts. :o

With regard to wasting time trying to convert non-thinkers on the internet, I agree. I've gotta have something to do at work when it's slow though. ;)
 
dzeanah: this person is offended by cowboy boots? Your response was absolutely terrific, but I think you're dealing with someone who's
a couple cans short of a six pack.

Dick
 
Well, another thing you can do with available time is to create letters to the editor of your local, and favorite national newspapers. Refine your technique, and make sure you keep to the length limitation - most seem to be 200 to 250 words.

Get a list of the top 100 to 250 newspapers in the country, add fax numbers and email addresses, and share that with your friends as well. A local advertising firm can probably help you at least get such a list started - they know the top papers.

If you become too prolific, and therefore they won't publish much or all of your work, then recruit some friends. Your friends can send in some of your work with their own.

Keep working on the fence sitters ... most of our friends, neighbors, family and co-workers are logical people that just need to hear the truth.

Good luck. Regards from AZ
 
A good point Dennis made - "On the other hand, your views may be appreciated by some innocent bystanders."

I'll go toe-to-toe with a True Believer just to get our point of view out to the fence-sitters. That's what I have been doing at the San Antonio MMM message board. They've got some REAL lame-os there.

Per Jeff Thomas' hint, here's a couple of addresses that have newspapers' URLs. Once at the paper's site, you might have to root around though, many hide their own contact points.
http://www.kidon.com/media-link/index.shtml http://www.onlinenewspapers.com/



------------------
The New World Order has a Third Reich odor.
 
You realize, of course, you are dealing with a delusional paranoid schizophrenic? Hopefully the other readers will profit from your very lucid commments.
 
Back
Top