• Anything ‘published’ on the web is viewed as intellectual property and, regardless of whether it displays a copyright symbol or not, is therefore copyrighted by the originator. The only exception to this is if there is a “free and unrestricted reuse” statement associated with the work.

    In order to protect our members and TFL from possible litigation, all members must abide by the following new rules:

    1. Copying and pasting entire articles from another site to TFL is strictly prohibited. The same applies to articles from print or other media, and to posting photographs taken of copyrighted pages or other media.

    2. Copyright law provides for “fair use” of portions of a copyrighted work. You can copy no more than a SINGLE paragraph from the article to your post (3 or 4 sentences at most).

    3. You must provide a link to the article along with the name of website. For example: ww.xxx.yyy/zzz (The Lower Thumbsuck Daily News).

    4. You must provide, in your own words, a brief summary of the article AND your reasons for believing it will be of interest to TFL members. Failure to do so may result in the thread being closed or your post being deleted as a “cut and paste drive by.”

    5. Photographs and other images are also copyrighted. "Hotlinking" of images (so that it appears in your message) from other sites is also prohibited unless you own rights to the image. If you wish to share an image, provide a clickable link to it.

    Posts that do not follow these new guidelines will be altered or deleted by staff. Members who continue to violate this policy may lose their posting privileges at TFL.

    Thank you for your cooperation and your participation in TFL, the leading online forum for firearms enthusiasts.

Advanced search question

B

blueorb

New member
I am trying to figure out how to perform a search on a particular phrase: .38 super. However, the software is pulling up anything that 38 OR super so it pulls up a ton of irrelevant results.
I even tried the Google form of ".38 super" with the quotes; no luck.

Any suggestions?

Thanks.
 
Yes - use Google for your search. To do that, you simply precede your search argument with site:thefiringline.com

As you have already seen the search engine is sorely lacking in sophistication.
 
"As you have already seen the search engine is sorely lacking in sophistication."

Which is odd, given that we are such a sewphystikated bunch... :p
 
sewphystikated
Click to expand...
That's sounds penicillin resistant!

Google search is superior by a long shot. Maybe TFL's search function should just dump one to a google search page with the site pre-filled. My organization finally did that and now we can actually find stuff.
 
"Maybe TFL's search function should just dump one to a google search page with the site pre-filled."

I believe we (tyme) tried that a while back and it caused some unforeseen problems. It had to be changed back to the native search engine. I don't reckymember the details.

MikePGS created a specific Google search link at THR last year. If anyone feels ambitious and wants to create one here, I'll sticky it at the top.
 
The problem inherent in google is that it will not distinguish between posts on the same page. It will tend to rank based on keyword proximity, which might give posts matching all keywords some ranking advantage, but it will not completely throw out results where, say, .38 and super occur on the same page of a thread but in different posts.

If you want to search for a phrase, like ".38 super", -then- you can use google to get reliable results. Since you're searching for one phrase and not multiple keywords, google's inability to tell posts apart won't matter.

The search engine TFL uses is the best I've found so far. It has its limitations in features, but when the alternatives are a) use google; or b) throw more servers at the problem, I think this does pretty well. It performs extremely well.

Don't forget there are also privacy implications from outsourcing searching to google. Some people hate google with a passion. What would they do if TFL's search form went direct to google?

However, the software is pulling up anything that 38 OR super so it pulls up a ton of irrelevant results.
Click to expand...
Are you sure? I did a quick spot check and search results for .38 super seem to include both words. The engine doesn't support phrase/proximity searching, so ".38 super" won't work like it would with mysql fulltext, but in that case you can use google.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top