Abolitionist's rifle engulfs N.J. artist in fray - P.C. Thought Police at Work

Oatka

New member
You can bet this guy won't be invited to any more liberal parties. Blacks defending themselves with guns? How droll!

"In a case that pits historical realism against modern sensitivity to the gun violence gripping American cities,...", i.e. truth against moral relativism.

Symbolism uber alles.

http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index.ssf?/page1/ledger/fcb80f.html

Abolitionist's rifle engulfs N.J. artist in fray

06/13/00

By John Yocca
STAFF WRITER

Her every step a perilous one, famed abolitionist Harriet Tubman could afford no slip-ups as she shuttled slaves to freedom through the Underground Railroad.

Timing was tight, indecision an enemy. When escaped slaves in her care hesitated on the frightening march to liberation, Tubman, a determined and gritty former slave herself, coaxed them northward with a loaded gun.

A century-and-a-half later, New Jersey artist Mike Alewitz chose that image of Tubman -- a lantern in one hand, a rifle in the other -- as the centerpiece for one of five sprawling ceramic murals he fashioned for the state of Maryland, Tubman's birthplace.

For Alewitz, the depiction is appropriate, both historically accurate and symbolic of the danger Tubman faced as she led more than 300 slaves out of captivity. But the artist's creation has been less than well received by the nonprofit group that was to display the work on an exterior wall in Baltimore this month.

In a case that pits historical realism against modern sensitivity to the gun violence gripping American cities, Associated Black Charities says it will likely turn down the piece because the weapon in Tubman's hand sends the wrong message.

"We feel that in the year 2000, it is inappropriate for a piece of artwork depicting guns and violence to be displayed on our wall in Baltimore, which had more than 300 murders last year," said Donna Jones Stanley, 44, the group's executive director. "This is an organization that strengthens the fabric of the African-American community, and I'm not sure this depiction helps us as a community to strengthen ourselves."

Stressing that she is opposed to censorship and that she finds Alewitz's work aesthetically moving, Stanley nevertheless said her group must be careful about what it places on its high-profile building, visible up to a mile away.

"It is a very prominent building," Stanley said. "That means we have a lot of responsibility, and we take that responsibility very seriously."

Today, the nonprofit's board of directors will vote on whether to accept the mural. Stanley said she's confident the board will back her recommendation to pass on the work.

That's fine with Alewitz, 49, an internationally acclaimed, New Brunswick-based artist who refused a compromise request by Associated Black Charities to turn the rifle into a less controversial staff.

"They don't have an objection to Harriet Tubman," Alewitz said. "They have an objection to Harriet Tubman with a rifle. It's like you want to see wolves in the wild -- but without teeth. They can refuse the mural, and that's their right. We'll find another wall."

The mural, a 25-foot-high, 130-foot-wide tiled mosaic, is one of five Alewitz created for Baltimore Clayworks, a ceramic arts group that funded the venture with a $25,000 grant from the Mid-Atlantic Arts Foundation. Baltimore Clayworks chose Alewitz from among hundreds of artists across the country.

All five works feature Tubman, a native of Dorchester County, Md.

Blaise DePaolo, the group's community programs coordinator, said Clayworks stands behind Alewitz in the controversy and will find someplace else to display the mural if it's turned away.

The mosaic depicts Tubman as Moses parting the sea, an army of liberated slaves and freedom fighters amassed behind her. On one side of the work, white figures, representing slave masters, are tossed from a boat in the roiling water.

Experts call the gun-wielding woman in the mural an accurate representation of Tubman, the most famous "conductor" on the Underground Railroad, the network of people committed to help slaves find freedom. Tubman and others brought escaped slaves from safehouse to safehouse on an arduous trek north. Many of those stops were in New Jersey, including Cape May, where Tubman worked in hotels.

The trip was dicey business. If caught, escaped slaves and those who helped them faced severe punishment, often death.

Taking no chances, Tubman, who escaped slavery at age 29, armed herself with a pistol. And she wasn't shy about waving it around to make a point.

"Sometimes she would hold a pistol to the slaves' heads and say something like, 'Dead people don't tell no tales,' " said Kay McElvey, a member of a research and information team for the Harriet Tubman organization in Cambridge, Md. "Sometimes she carried rifles as well."

For Alewitz, the Tubman theme was a natural fit. He's made a career of working on behalf of the underdog, the oppressed and the working class.

An ardent opponent of the Vietnam War during the late 1960s and early 1970s, he later focused on labor causes. As the artist in residence for the New Jersey Industrial Union Council AFL-CIO, he designed signs and banners for striking union workers.

Alewitz also serves as artistic director for the Labor, Art and Mural Project, which is in the process of moving from Rutgers University to Central Connecticut State University in New Britain, Conn.

A 10-year New Jersey resident, Alewitz has traveled around the world to paint murals, some of them with a decidedly political bent. And while he's not one to back down from a confrontation, he's not ruffled by the Baltimore flap.

"It's a work of art. They're blowing it out of proportion," he said. "It's one person's expression. You don't have to agree with it."

Staff writer Mark Mueller contributed to this report.

© 2000 The Star-Ledger.



[This message has been edited by Oatka (edited June 13, 2000).]
 
Another revision of history because someone got offended that a politically incorrect firearm was displayed for historical accuracy. They want to blather under their First Amendment right, but God help you if you use that same right to portray your message if it is not in perfect agreement. And silly me, all along I thought the idea behind the FA was someone would be offended but too bad.
 
They will turn it down because it will upset certain Maryland Politicans and some of the foundations backers. A black woman with a rifle is a true nightmare to some folks still. That's history to be buried for sure!
These things happen all the time with public art, especially when the artist is bull headed, which I usually admire. You don't know how amny artists would pander their souls to make a buck on any type of commission. Actually, its kind of hard to blame them for this, its a tough way to make a living.
Things like this will help the Tubman story live on whether they get the mural up somewhere else or not. Her image is controversial and appealling and this could not happen in a more appropiate state than Maryland.
 
That's just hilarious. A rifle in Tubman's hand is controversial and not "PC" but the mass execution of hundreds, if not thousands of whites is not? I can't believe no one said anthing about throwing white people off the boat to drown in the raging water below! I don't care if they WERE slave owners.
 
Update:

Source

Tubman mural with musket is rejected
Associated Black Charities decides artwork conveys wrong image for office

By Jamie Stiehm, Sun Staff

Saying it doesn't reflect their image, the Associated Black Charities board unanimously rejected last night a contentious mural of Harriet Tubman carrying a musket, which was intended for its downtown building at Cathedral and Chase streets.

Mural artist Mike Alewitz and staffers from Baltimore Clayworks, which commissioned the work, searched yesterday for "appropriately visible" sites and walls in the city for the larger-than-life image, which was originally planned to stand 25 feet tall on a wall facing Meyerhoff Symphony Hall.

"It needs to be a good public wall," Alewitz said.

"It's fine if it's not a good fit," Deborah Bedwell, executive director of Clayworks, said before last night's vote. Clayworks, a Mount Washington nonprofit, chose Alewitz to portray the Underground Railroad leader in five works to be installed in Maryland as part of a Mid-Atlantic Arts Council project. She said his work centers on social justice themes.

The musket in the mural design stirred an outcry about historical truth vs. contemporary reality.

Some suggested that Alewitz's design, showing Tubman holding a musket as she symbolically parts a Red Sea and leads slaves to freedom, condones gun violence.

The issue triggered debate about whether it was appropriate for Associated Black Charities' public wall in a city that records at least 300 homicides a year.

"It has started the community discussing slavery, race and history," said Donna Jones Stanley, the Associated executive director, who recommended against Alewitz's design.

Since 1985, the Associated has been a leading presence in the black community, giving nearly $6 million in grants to programs benefiting the greater Baltimore area.

It is agreed Tubman carried a gun for protection, but Stanley declared, "It is not historically correct. She carried a pistol, not a rifle. It's his vision, but it's our wall."

A few urged Alewitz to substitute a staff for the musket. He refused last week, saying, "I will not disarm Harriet Tubman. ... There was nothing safe about her." Phillip Sterling and Rayford Logan wrote in "Four Took Freedom" that Tubman made 11 trips from Maryland to Canada from 1852 to 1857, leading about 300 to freedom. "Her most famous trip concerned a passenger who panicked and wanted to turn back. Tubman was afraid if he left he would be tortured and would tell all he knew. The unwilling passenger changed his mind when Tubman pointed a gun at his head and said 'dead folks tell no tales.'"

Said Alewitz: "Nothing will stop this historic endeavor. Harriet Tubman will live on the walls of Maryland."

The Sun has a message board at: this link.

Edited to fix formatting problem -TBM

[This message has been edited by TheBluesMan (edited June 14, 2000).]
 
So Harriet just asked the oppressors to play nice, and they said, "Golly gee, Miz Tubman, you'se right!", huh?

"Let my people go" is fine as long you have the force to back it up. Since none of us is Moses, we have to fall back on the good old smokepole.

PC/Revisionist lurkers out there: Pull your heads out. Sometimes force is necessary to prevent evil. If you can't or won't accept it, you're welcome to get off my planet and establish Utopia somewhere else.
 
This is the kind of stuff (hysteria) that is being created right now, the consequences of which could be bad. They are uncomfortable with the symbol of the gun being a legitimate tool of these peoples liberation. In their minds it opens the door a crack that the gun could still be a tool used for legitimate things, such as self defense. While an obvious truth,(to me) it is a very politically incorrect thing to do these days. They would hate to be responsible for people actually thinking realistically about the situation. They are also trying to rewrite history in a way that makes them feel more comfortable with themselves as a product of that history. A lot of people have fought hard (with guns), for our freedoms. Too many people seem ready to let those freedoms go without a fight. "don't it always seem to go that you don't know what you've got till it's gone?" As the artist said......"we'll find another wall!"




[This message has been edited by ol blue (edited June 14, 2000).]
 
...and by the way, what Herodotus said about the artists having a tough time is true. Maybe we should be thinking in terms of supporting the efforts of some of these artists who are willing to tell it like it is. It's obvious the antis are scared of this sort of thing, that should give us an idea. Never underestimate the power of the visual image, especially in public, 25 ft tall. So how bout it? Anyone have a spare wall? ......ol blue
 
Perhaps we should commission artists to revise some of our famous historic paintings.
In the painting of Washington crossing the Delaware, the artists could replace the muskets with fishing rods.

Dick
 
I understand Mel Gibson is under fire for a similiar incident in his newest movie. In Patriot he hands rifles to his teenage sons & he is being accused of "sending the wrong message"!

I guess we won our freedom with sticks & stones!
 
"It's like you want to see wolves in the wild -- but without teeth."

Wish I'd said that.

The art form desired by these morons is called "socialist realism," and we all know how much socialism depends on reality, don't we?
 
Back
Top