Pond James Pond
New member
I hoot IPSC in production division. I shoot a CZ 75 SP-01.
I have been vaguely entertaining the idea of selling my existing race gun in order to get one that would be more practical in other areas of my shooting whilst still being IPSC eligible.
I am not interested in an analysis of my choice of gun, just on the interpretation of the current IPSC rules that could influence if a gun is possible to use.
The guns I am considering are the CZ Rami sub-compact and the CZ 75 Compact. I am considering either the safety model, but would prefer the decocker D model. It is the decocker model this thread concerns.
The IPSC production approved handgun list lists them all as approved for Production division.
In section 8.1.2.5 IPSC rules say:
That would seem to suggest that if you use a decocking lever you are good to go, and only manually decocked models require the hammer to be all the way down.
However the production division appendix section paragraph 15 makes further assertions:
So now it seems that any gun with a hammer, no matter how it can be lowered safely must have a fully decocked hammer.
Since I started researching the decocker models I listed above, I have found out that these CZs, when decocked using the lever, drop the hammer to half-cock position, thus contravening paragraph 15 listed above, yet rule 8.1.2.5 would prohibit me from performing any decocking by hand if there is a lever designed to do the job.
So how would one "make ready" with a CZ decocker model that only drops the hammer half way?!
Can you help?
Have you competed with these or similar guns?
IPSC only please!
I have been vaguely entertaining the idea of selling my existing race gun in order to get one that would be more practical in other areas of my shooting whilst still being IPSC eligible.
I am not interested in an analysis of my choice of gun, just on the interpretation of the current IPSC rules that could influence if a gun is possible to use.
The guns I am considering are the CZ Rami sub-compact and the CZ 75 Compact. I am considering either the safety model, but would prefer the decocker D model. It is the decocker model this thread concerns.
The IPSC production approved handgun list lists them all as approved for Production division.
In section 8.1.2.5 IPSC rules say:
If a handgun has a decocking lever, that alone must be used to decock the handgun, without touching the trigger. If a handgun does not have a decocking lever, the hammer must be safely and manually lowered all the way forward (i.e. not just to a “half-cock notch” or to another similar intermediary position).
That would seem to suggest that if you use a decocking lever you are good to go, and only manually decocked models require the hammer to be all the way down.
However the production division appendix section paragraph 15 makes further assertions:
Handguns with external hammers must be fully decocked (see Rule 8.1.2.5), at the Start Signal.
So now it seems that any gun with a hammer, no matter how it can be lowered safely must have a fully decocked hammer.
Since I started researching the decocker models I listed above, I have found out that these CZs, when decocked using the lever, drop the hammer to half-cock position, thus contravening paragraph 15 listed above, yet rule 8.1.2.5 would prohibit me from performing any decocking by hand if there is a lever designed to do the job.
So how would one "make ready" with a CZ decocker model that only drops the hammer half way?!
Can you help?
Have you competed with these or similar guns?
IPSC only please!