It was like a reunion Saturday at PGC. A lot of folks I've shot with(and enjoyed it) were there and some new shotguns to admire. By the time I was done, I had handled and shot 3 or 4,ranging from a CLASSIC 870M (ca 1970)with great wood and in perfect condition to a new Synthetic stocked 11-87 and a 391 Extrema likewise dressed in plastic. There was an 1100 also, a newer one bought from Sears and with aftermarket plastic.These were field guns, not competition guns, brought to sharpen up before bird hunts.
I ran one shotshell through each and hit all the birds.
The common factor was stock length. All were short, from a good bit short to very short. The 391 had been trimmed a bit, the owner was built like a fire plug.
I adjusted for length by moving my support hand forward a bit. What was giving me the blues was the varying amount of drop.
Looking over the bbl on each of these gave a different picture. The 391 had so much drop my cheek weld was a chin weld.
The 1100 was almost as bad. That aftermarket stock didn't match the original, and it took some skooching around to get the bead visible.Not so bad when premounted, but pure heck when hunting.
I'm doing most of my wingshooting and clays with Frankenstein and the TB. Both now have M/C stocks, the TB has a 15" LOP and Frank has a 14 1/2" one, more befitting a field gun set up for me. Both have drop at cheek of a little over an inch.Both shoot about 60/40, ideal for a field gun, IMO.
Lot of us have more than one shotgun, and oft shoot one better than the rest. We obsess about LOP, but often ignore the other dimensions. We've preached about gun fit here, and maybe we should emphasize drop at cheek more than we have.
SO, if you have a shotgun that's shooting much better for you than the others, measure the drop at cheek and compare. While there's other dimensions that matter, I've a hunch drop is crucial.
Questions, comments?....
I ran one shotshell through each and hit all the birds.
The common factor was stock length. All were short, from a good bit short to very short. The 391 had been trimmed a bit, the owner was built like a fire plug.
I adjusted for length by moving my support hand forward a bit. What was giving me the blues was the varying amount of drop.
Looking over the bbl on each of these gave a different picture. The 391 had so much drop my cheek weld was a chin weld.
The 1100 was almost as bad. That aftermarket stock didn't match the original, and it took some skooching around to get the bead visible.Not so bad when premounted, but pure heck when hunting.
I'm doing most of my wingshooting and clays with Frankenstein and the TB. Both now have M/C stocks, the TB has a 15" LOP and Frank has a 14 1/2" one, more befitting a field gun set up for me. Both have drop at cheek of a little over an inch.Both shoot about 60/40, ideal for a field gun, IMO.
Lot of us have more than one shotgun, and oft shoot one better than the rest. We obsess about LOP, but often ignore the other dimensions. We've preached about gun fit here, and maybe we should emphasize drop at cheek more than we have.
SO, if you have a shotgun that's shooting much better for you than the others, measure the drop at cheek and compare. While there's other dimensions that matter, I've a hunch drop is crucial.
Questions, comments?....