Mods, I don't mean to get in your chili, but lately some threads have been closed for being in "the wrong forum," that I'm not so sure were in the wrong forum.
Example: problem with an LC9 trigger pull.
Yes, an LC9 is a semi-automatic, but a trigger pull issue, and how to train to use that trigger, is not really semi-auto specific. IMO, it's more of a general handgun question, that just happens to be framed around an LC9 in that particular example.
I could see it being an issue if the question had been about magazine or feed issues, etc, but a trigger?
My point is, where is the dividing line? Arguably, a trigger issue with an LC9 could also have been considered more appropriate to the smithing forum - if the question were how to fix it, or the tactics and training forum - if the question were how to train and adapt to it. But sometimes, even though the gun in the example might be a revolver or a semi-auto, the actual questions and answers aren't particularly type specific.
So, why not the general handgun forum?
Thanks for clarification.
Example: problem with an LC9 trigger pull.
Yes, an LC9 is a semi-automatic, but a trigger pull issue, and how to train to use that trigger, is not really semi-auto specific. IMO, it's more of a general handgun question, that just happens to be framed around an LC9 in that particular example.
I could see it being an issue if the question had been about magazine or feed issues, etc, but a trigger?
My point is, where is the dividing line? Arguably, a trigger issue with an LC9 could also have been considered more appropriate to the smithing forum - if the question were how to fix it, or the tactics and training forum - if the question were how to train and adapt to it. But sometimes, even though the gun in the example might be a revolver or a semi-auto, the actual questions and answers aren't particularly type specific.
So, why not the general handgun forum?
Thanks for clarification.