Glenn E. Meyer
New member
Yes, that's what I believe - Dennis.
Maybe I will write a big post about it later. I've said though
previously actions I would take. Here's a short take.
I think the 50 million can be seduced by appeals for the right
of self-defense. Get guns in their hands and then they will
support the RKBA.
I regard the self-defense user as an activist gun person who
is more powerful for the cause than the ducky gun owner.
Also, with a two term Bush presidency - when some bad laws come
up to their sunset period, we have a chance to let them die.
No chance of that with Gore.
I also think that national reciprocity for CCW has a chance with
Bush - I regard this as crucial as it continues the successful
Kleck and Lott story.
I would also try things that you regard as compromise.
For example, I would trade a mandatory sale of trigger locks
with guns for law in the same package that said in every state in the Union, with a NICS check a citizen can buy a handgun to keep in home or business. That's it, just the check and you get to buy a gun.
This would be a dramatic change for many areas like NYC and increase the self-defense gun ownership immensely.
I might suggest that with a NICS check (since NICS is SOOO successful) that hi-cap mags be sold to civilians again. I might trade this for NICS checks on private sales on shows. It's going to happen anyway. The referendum in Colorado will probably pass. So use it.
There are things that can be done to incrementally get back things and expand our rights.
With Gore there is no chance of this.
The Conservative epiphany will not happen. To wait for it and engage in self-destructive behaviors is meaningless.
If Bush is strongly supported by RKBA folks he will listen. If the hard core votes for third party and he still winds, his natural conclusion is that he does not need this set of nut cases. That will really make him support the RKBA strongly, won't it?
Disagree if you you but as I said to Randy, you have to come up with a plan to win rather than this passive sitting there and complaining. I don't regard raising money from a shrinking segment of the population to be a plan.
Maybe I will write a big post about it later. I've said though
previously actions I would take. Here's a short take.
I think the 50 million can be seduced by appeals for the right
of self-defense. Get guns in their hands and then they will
support the RKBA.
I regard the self-defense user as an activist gun person who
is more powerful for the cause than the ducky gun owner.
Also, with a two term Bush presidency - when some bad laws come
up to their sunset period, we have a chance to let them die.
No chance of that with Gore.
I also think that national reciprocity for CCW has a chance with
Bush - I regard this as crucial as it continues the successful
Kleck and Lott story.
I would also try things that you regard as compromise.
For example, I would trade a mandatory sale of trigger locks
with guns for law in the same package that said in every state in the Union, with a NICS check a citizen can buy a handgun to keep in home or business. That's it, just the check and you get to buy a gun.
This would be a dramatic change for many areas like NYC and increase the self-defense gun ownership immensely.
I might suggest that with a NICS check (since NICS is SOOO successful) that hi-cap mags be sold to civilians again. I might trade this for NICS checks on private sales on shows. It's going to happen anyway. The referendum in Colorado will probably pass. So use it.
There are things that can be done to incrementally get back things and expand our rights.
With Gore there is no chance of this.
The Conservative epiphany will not happen. To wait for it and engage in self-destructive behaviors is meaningless.
If Bush is strongly supported by RKBA folks he will listen. If the hard core votes for third party and he still winds, his natural conclusion is that he does not need this set of nut cases. That will really make him support the RKBA strongly, won't it?
Disagree if you you but as I said to Randy, you have to come up with a plan to win rather than this passive sitting there and complaining. I don't regard raising money from a shrinking segment of the population to be a plan.