9mm SIG or Glock

Hello,

A simple question from a greenhorn:
I wonder which gun is the better one in terms of stopping power, soft recoil, no jaming, and durability.

Thanks
Blues
 
Price- Glock
Reliability- Glock
Accuracy- tossup
Looks- tossup

Overall feel- priceless

What it boils down to is, which gun feels best in your hand? I like the feel of the 228 the best.
 
I think the Glock, in comparable sized models, has less muzzle flip than the Sig.

I like the utter simplicity of the Glock's design, which means that the owner/user can easily 'smith it themselves, should you decide that minor changes/improvements are needed.

Reliability, durability, and accuracy, for me, are a toss-up between the two.

BUT, as others have said, if it's to be your weapon it has to be your choice. Maybe a nearby range has rentals of each that you can try before you buy? Good luck.

------------------
Make mine lean, mean, and 9x19!
 
Stopping power depends on the caliber you get and how much you train and practice. No pistol or caliber can replace skill. I suggest .40, but everyone has their favorite and they're all good.

Which models are you looking to get? It would help if you provided this information.

Recoil is softer with Glocks. The Glock's polymer frame, unless your looking at a sig pro, absorbs recoil while the aluminum alloy frame of SIG Sauers transmit it directly to your hand. I also feel that Glocks have less muzzle flip than other pistols in comparable calibers.

Glocks and SIG Sauers have both been reliable in my experience. I've onlyhad trouble with one second generation G19, but this was na isolated case. All the others have been absolutely reliable, through thousands of rounds of all types of ammo.

For sheer durability I'd have to say Glock. It's a simple design that anyone can work on. The Tenifer finish makes it far more corrosion resistant than any SIG Sauer.

You also need to consider the trigger pulls. If you're looking to SA/DA get ready to master two different trigger pulls. Some folks have trouble with the longer DA. Glock's trigger avois this completely, same trigger pull shot after shot.

What will work better for you? Only YOU can decide this. Check out the following sites for more information.
www.remtek.com/arms/glock/index.htm
www.remtek.com/arms/sig/index.htm
http://glockmeister.com/glockinf.html

------------------
"Get yourself a Lorcin and lose that nickel plated sissy pistol."
 
I'd trust my life to either one. The Sig is a little heavier, but slightly more accurate. YOU CAN'T GO WRONG WITH EITHER ONE! Pick the one that feels "best" in your hands.

John
 
I have the equivalent guns in .40 (the G23 and 229). Both excellent guns. The Glock carries a little better because it's lighter, while the Sig shoots a little nicer because it's heavier. The biggest difference I've found is that I treat the Sig a lot better. I feel that the Glock I can toss in my glovebox, carry around a lot more, keep it stored in a holster, etc., while the Sig gets babied more (I rarely carry it, I'm more careful with it, it stays in the box always, etc.).
 
Comparing 9mm Sig to Glock

Accuracy: Sig (much more accurate than 9mm Glocks)
Recoil: Glock (low bore axis/polymer frame reduces recoil more efficiently than the heavier weight of the Sig IMHO)
Durability: Glock (much more durable than a Sig)
Looks: Sig
Price: Glock
Ergonomics: Sig
Pointability: Glock
Reliability: Slight edge to Sig

Overall, tossup! Whatever fits you the best. In 9mm, I prefer Sigs. But, in .45 I prefer Glocks...
 
Blues:

Which has best stopping power? Uh, they're both 9mm, so there isn't going to be any significant difference in stopping power.

Both will have little recoil, but then that's true for all but the most compact of 9mm.

As for having "no jaming", all semi-autos can and will have feed failures from time to time. That's true of both Sigs and Glocks. But both Sigs and Glocks are among the more reliable.

Glocks might get the nod on reliablility, but Sigs are good guns as well.

Much more important than any of the things that you mentioned is the fact that Sigs are DA/SA, where as Glocks are striker-fired. While I tend to prefer guns which have a consistent trigger pull (either striker-fired, or DAO, or SA), that's truly a religious issue that you have to decide for yourself. Also, see which one fits your hand better.

I own two Glocks and a Sig, and will say that Sigs and Glocks are both fine manufacturers.

Jared
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by M1911:
Blues:

Which has best stopping power? Uh, they're both 9mm, so there isn't going to be any significant difference in stopping power.

Both will have little recoil, but then that's true for all but the most compact of 9mm.

As for having "no jaming", all semi-autos can and will have feed failures from time to time. That's true of both Sigs and Glocks. But both Sigs and Glocks are among the more reliable.

Glocks might get the nod on durability, but Sigs are good guns as well.

Much more important than any of the things that you mentioned is the fact that Sigs are DA/SA, where as Glocks are striker-fired. While I tend to prefer guns which have a consistent trigger pull (either striker-fired, or DAO, or SA), that's truly a religious issue that you have to decide for yourself. Also, see which one fits your hand better.

I own two Glocks and a Sig, and will say that Sigs and Glocks are both fine manufacturers.

Jared
[/quote]
 
That is a very very very hard question to answer. Both a very very very good. You may have thought you narrowed the selection down, nope, just made it harder. The only was to farly solve it without hurting the other ones feelings is to flip a coin. Or, maybe get both :)
 
I had the same problem myself, way back when. I hemmed and hawed for probably 6 months, before I came to a decision. I ended up with a Glock. The factors which made up my mind were -

(1)A police training center has a Glock 17 that they've been trying to break - so far it's had two stoppages in over 150,000 rounds - both magazine related. That's one hell of a track record, and definitely durable enough and reliable enough for me.

(2)The Glock 19 I ended up with was lighter and more compact than the Sig I handled - It felt better in the hand, and since I planned on a daily carry I wanted the lightest piece I could get by with. The Sig was nice, definitely, but it seemed a lot heavier and bulkier than the Glock.

(3)The price was better for the Glock, and the Tenifer finish is pretty much maintenance free. I've heard that the Sig finish is more high-maintenance. For daily carry, again I wanted a durable finish.

That's what did it for me. As far as accuracy goes, I've never shot a Sig, but don't let people tell you that Glocks are inaccurate. I think it's the *hack hack* "unique" trigger that makes them harder to shoot accurately. If you get used to it, it's easily manageable. A local gun guru took my Glock 19 and opened a nice 1" hole in the x-ring with it at 15 yards with a full magazine, offhand. He had been shooting his 17 since they were first imported here, though ;-)

I'd go with the Glock, IMHO.



------------------
Glock 19
S&W 629 Classic
KelTec P32

"Oh yeah? Well I talk LOOOUDLY! And I carry a BIIIGGER stick! And I'll use it, too." -Yoesemite Sam
 
Go to a range and shoot both the GLOCK and SIG. See which one you shoot better with. Either way, your going to get a kick ass pistol since these are some of the best on the market today.
 
Part of the problem with going with FEEL is that it will feel way different when you are shooting it than it does at the store.

I would say the Sig just feels better and looks cooler in the hand (gives you those warm fuzzies at the store), but go to the range, and I think the Glock feels better under fire (both the trigger, and the recoil etc).
 
As stated by others it can be considered a personal issue. I agree you should go to a range that rents pistols and try both. One thing that sometimes bothers new shooters is the SA/DA vs say either the striker fired like the Glock or a SA only like the 1911. I grew up on DA revolvers so SA/DA never did give me any trouble but I know it can be an issue. I like them All. MWT
 
the stopping power of a 9mm glock is equal to that of a 9mm sig. its not the gun its the bullet that stops the BG. but if one of the guns has a longer barrel than the other it will give the bullet more velocity and therefore more stopping power. i'm going to compare the Glock 19 to the Sig 228 since i know the most about them but the same comparison will hold true in comparing a Glock 17 to a Sig 226 or a Glock 26 to a Sig 239/225.

most people will find that the 228 will have less felt recoil than the G19 since it weighs more but the G19 has a polymer frame which absorbs recoil so it too doesn't have much recoil. recoil isn't that big an issue with 9mms unless your comparing sub-compact guns. i find that beretta 92's recoil extreemly softly and that glocks and sigs recoil a bit more but its not much worse.

glocks tend to point on target faster for people than sigs since they have a more natural grip angle. i find that the G19 fits my hand really well and it points very well for me.

glocks and sigs are very reliable guns. if clean and properly lubricated at the range you should not ever have a problem with either. but glocks will work in more situations than sigs will. you can go without cleaning a glock for a year and it should still work properly (i wouldn't advise this) but a sig would most likely jam. also glocks will work after being dropped in sand, salt water, mud, and many more things where this may cause a sig's action to jam. glocks can be run over by cars, dropped out of windows 400 feet in the air, tossed over your head, etc and still work and they even won't fire the round in the chamber thru all this. another plus is the tenifer finish on glocks is much more rust resistant than that of sigs.

last i heard Chuck Taylor's G17 had 165,000 rounds thru it and was still going strong but that was about a year ago. i doubt that could be possible with a sig. there are many rumors going around about sig's aluminum frames cracking and glocks constantly KB'ing but as i said these are rumors. both those things do happen but a lot less than people make it out to be. both guns have a good chance of outliving you unless you shoot a lot. i have seen a sig 226 that had numerous +P rounds of 9mm thru it and it didn't work reliably because it was too worn in. but IIRC the factory said they'd fix all broken or worn parts for a pretty reasonable price.

as for accuracy i find both guns are very accurate. i shoot glocks more accurately because of the trigger and that the gun points very well for me. i don't like DA/SA guns because unless i really slow down i pull the DA shot off center. with training i could become a better shot but i have my glocks so i'm fine :-). if you put both guns on a ransom rest at 25yrds the sig would most likely produce better groups but i don't feel that matters. they were both designed for Police/Military use and are more than "combat accurate".

some other things to consider: for the size glocks offer more firepower. the G19 and 228 are similar sized but the G19 holds 2 more rounds. the G17 also holds 2 more rounds than the 226 and the G26 holds 2 more rounds than the 239 or 225. 2 rounds isn't much of a difference though. also when comparing like sized glocks to sigs the glock weighs more and is smaller. i remember when i was buying my G19 i was also considering a 228. i held the 228 and even though i could never conceal carry (live in NJ) i thought to myself how could i ever carry this gun its pretty big and quite heavy. then i picked up the G19 and it looked quite a bit smaller and was definetly a lot lighter.

glocks cost a bit less. i bought my G19 for $459 but since then the price has risen to about $500. sigs can be found somewhere in the $500s or $600 depending on the model. hi-cap mags for both are quite pricy.

i would go to the range and rent both these guns to try them out and see which you like better. you may find you shoot one a lot better than the other. the glock trigger take some getting used to so you should try both guns several times. i know i seemed to favor glocks but they are both very good top of the line guns. i would feel well armed with either.
 
Glock - more reliable, just as accurate and more accessories, more concealable - no hammer. Sold my P220 and P226. broke two trigger springs on the Sigs. Ain't broke a darn thing on the Glocks.

------------------
The Seattle SharpShooter - TFL/GT/UGW/PCT/KTOG
 
Back
Top