Same weight, only slightly smaller, 4 fewer rounds, and $200 more. Why?
I'm really not a KelTec basher, but the Kahr price has been slammed a couple of times in this thread.
Why does a Ruger MK II .22 pistol cost $200 more than a Jennings J22?
If you've shot both, you know the answer.
I've had two J22s. Both were reliable little plinkers.
The Ruger is in a different class. It is pistol that your grandkids will still be shooting 100k+ rounds after you are dust.
Same with the P11 vs. the MK9.
There is a huge quality gap in the two guns.
I consider the Kahr to be a belt gun, but then I also considered both of the P11s that I had, to be belt guns.
To me the P11 is too large, and when loaded, too heavy for pocket carry. I also find the MK9 to be heavy for pocket carry.
Many don't agree with me on this, but I think everyone agrees that either will disappear in a good IWB holster.
But, trust me on this,
a Kahr is certainly worth $200 more than a KelTec.
Several police departments have approved Kahr guns for backup carry. Have any approved a KelTec?
There certainly may be some, but I haven't heard of any.
The KelTec gunsmith told me that they don't recommend Wolf ammo for their guns. The last one that I had wouldn't feed Wolf very well.
WalMart has Winchester white box 9mm for less than $12 for 100rds.
Many have stated that P11s won't shoot that either.
My Kahr cost $250 more, and weighs 8oz more. It has a trigger that I get emotional about, and I can't find ammo that it won't feed.
Partly because of the KelTec trigger, good accuracy is hard to acheive with that gun. I was impressed with the Kahr accuracy after I had fired one magazine.
You pays your money, and you makes your choice.