Little Wolf
New member
I want a nice .357 revolver for hunting, and carry. I was origonally looking at the L frame 686p in 4" as I liked the look of the gun and the thought of an extra capacity of 1 round. I had also origonally planned to get the gun set up for moon clips. I like the idea of magazine speed reloads for my revolver.
However, then it hit me.
Smith and Wesson already offers a gun set up the way I like it.
The 627-5!
It is an 8 shot .357 with a 5" barrel that is ALREADY set up for moonclips, though the frame is even bulkier (N frame).
So I only have a few questions to help me decide which one is better for me.
#1. Will the increased weight/bulk of the N frame 627 signifigantly make a difference in terms of carrying from the 686p? Is it that much bulkier a gun to accomidate the extra shot?
#2. Will the 8 shot moon clips simply be too large/cumbersome to practice efficent speed loading of moonclips compared to the smaller 7 shot ones? I heard someone saying that it was difficult to load the moonclips in the 627???
Those are the two main things I am concerned with as I wish to be able to carry this gun, which is why the 4" barrel of the 686 appeals to me. I doubt that one extra inch of barrel will matter much for the 627, though. It is just the extra bulk of the larger frame that concerns me as possibly becoming a problem in regards to carrying. Though I bet the 627's barrel would make it a more efficent hunting weapon.
The main advantages of the 686p are the smaller size (of barrel and frame) as well as the much cheaper cost. Even with the $100 or so extra it will cost to get the moonclip conversion, it will still be $300+ cheaper. The main advantages of the 627 are the extra round capacity, and the longer barrel for hunting.
Any info/advice would be appreciated.
However, then it hit me.
Smith and Wesson already offers a gun set up the way I like it.
The 627-5!
It is an 8 shot .357 with a 5" barrel that is ALREADY set up for moonclips, though the frame is even bulkier (N frame).
So I only have a few questions to help me decide which one is better for me.
#1. Will the increased weight/bulk of the N frame 627 signifigantly make a difference in terms of carrying from the 686p? Is it that much bulkier a gun to accomidate the extra shot?
#2. Will the 8 shot moon clips simply be too large/cumbersome to practice efficent speed loading of moonclips compared to the smaller 7 shot ones? I heard someone saying that it was difficult to load the moonclips in the 627???
Those are the two main things I am concerned with as I wish to be able to carry this gun, which is why the 4" barrel of the 686 appeals to me. I doubt that one extra inch of barrel will matter much for the 627, though. It is just the extra bulk of the larger frame that concerns me as possibly becoming a problem in regards to carrying. Though I bet the 627's barrel would make it a more efficent hunting weapon.
The main advantages of the 686p are the smaller size (of barrel and frame) as well as the much cheaper cost. Even with the $100 or so extra it will cost to get the moonclip conversion, it will still be $300+ cheaper. The main advantages of the 627 are the extra round capacity, and the longer barrel for hunting.
Any info/advice would be appreciated.