627 vs 686- pros and cons?

M

mckysdad

New member
Hi all-

Several past threads have made reference to the fact that the 627 is a more robust frame, and also less concealable. When I looked it up on the S&W site (under performance center) it actually looks like the difference is small, about .1" in length and 2.5 oz in weight btw the snubby 686 and the 627 as listed in the site. So now I am curious:
- is the 627 really less concealable or are we talking nitpickings?
- how to the ergonomics of the 627 compare to those of the 686?
- does it cost much $$ to ask for a longer barrel on the 627 (3.5" or 4")?

If there is notmuch difference in ergo and size, it seems that the N-framed 627 might be a really attractive option.

Thoughts??? I am not looking to start a religious war...
 
There is a difference in the two guns. The two main differences are in overall cylinder diameter and grip size.

The 686 has a cylinder sized inbetween a K-frame and an N-frame. It also has a grip the same size as the K-frame, that is why grips will fit either K or L interchangeably.

Of the two I would say use what works best for you. For myself I would pick the N-frame if I had to choose. I like the balance and the larger grip frame fits my hand better. A lot of people don't like the size and weight of an N-frame, even people who don't have medium to smaller hands.

At the moment S&W does not make a production N-frame .357 although they introduced a couple at the SHOT show. For the last few years if you wanted a new .357 N-frame it has been a Performance Center option......
 
Both these guns are impractical for all day carry. The 627 and 686 weigh 37.6 oz and 34.5 oz. unloaded. That is too heavy for a all day carry weapon. Although the 686's are available with 4" barrels, the 627's are custom production models only and what they build is what you get. At this time the only two 627's in production are in 5" (V Comp) and 2 5/8" barrels. There is no ergonomic advantage to either weapon. The only advantage the 627 has is in the weight department, that little extra meat makes it easier to shoot those Magnum loads. Sweat!
You are wise in your inquiry, .357 Magnums are best in barrel lengths 4" and over. Good move! If you really want a 627PC, the best one is the 5" version of this gun. There are still some new ones floating around.
S&W627pc.JPG


Robert



[This message has been edited by Robert the41MagFan (edited February 26, 2000).]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top