The guys are more or less correct...
The military started with 1:14", with 52 grain bullets, then wanted more energy at the target,
Went to a heavier bullet, 55 grains, which took a 1:12" barrel to stabilize.
As bullets got heavier, barrel twist rates got faster...
62 grain bullets took 1:10" or 1:9" to stabilize, 68 grain took 1:7" or 1:8" to stableize.
Continuing along those lines, I have, or have had, many of the 'Super .22' center fire rifles since about 1970...
Some have 1:16" barrels and shoot 35-40 grain bullets with astounding accuracy, but won't shoot a 50-55 grain bullet worth crap, just not what they were intended to shoot.
The old timers got it right!
I almost exclusively varmint hunt these days, coyotes, ground hogs, feral house cats...
I shoot a crap load of 'Light' bullets, mostly Hornady Vmax,
50-55 grain through 1:10 twist barrels, the 'Average' 10 shot group @100 yards you can cover with a nickel, some barrels producing 10 shot groups you can cover with a dime.
When I run that very same load through a 1:8" barrel, I'm lucky to do under a MOA.
My hog rifle (I have accurate rifles, not lead slinging 'Guns'),
Has 1:8" barrel, and shoots 60-65 grain 'Amax' or soft points quite well.
I was looking for a reasonable priced 1:10" barrel for an AR, couldn't find one, so I 'Settled for 1:8" and while not quite as accurate as my 1:10" bolt rifle with 60-65 grain loads, the 1:8" does a very respectable job.
I WOULDN'T take it to a bench rifle shoot, but it will put bacon on the table every time!