Now don't get me started David!
Have you been reading my posts? You actually have the audacity of suggesting a combination of one of, if not THE best type of handgun together with one of THE best new calibers?!..................................................................................Sounds like a winner to me too.
Here's the theory:
1) 45 Super-excellent all around caliber. Best of BOTH worlds. High frontal area AND high velocity. Satisfies the high vel and Fackler crowd. Out of the right tube and with the right early expansion bullet, would likely be extremely effective against bad guys, and adequate (in right load and close range) for deer hunting.
2) Can use 45ACP barrel. Sure the 460 Roland pushes max 44 mag ballistics, leaving the Super in its wake, but then you've got to switch back and forth between the extra barrel that you had to buy and fit, (which is not available for Sigs). Supers outer dimensions are exactly similar to the ACP...
a)Same dies
b)Two calibers out of one barrel
3) The sturdy Sig Al alloy frames are made to take +p pressured ammo. A backfire can mangle any weapon, however if you avoid double charges, the fully supported chamber on Sigs helps. Frame battering should not be a problem as long as shooting of it is limited.
Problem:
1) I don't know how reliable the 245 would be since the company chose to ignore my advise to make a compact grip/ long barrelled 225 in 45 ACP. Since the think tank at SIGARMS decided to cut the muzzle, the slide length might not allow sufficient time to allow a new round to be chambered. Timing is everything. Short slide = quick cycle, maybe too quick for the Super. There are cooler Super loadings made for the Colt Commander, which might work better. Just have to spend the fortune the ammo costs to see. I'd use heavy recoil spring before trying it though.
2) Short barrel (3.9") = lower velocity.
Much of the ammos potential vel. would be lost as muzzle flash. It really needs a long tube to make use of all of the powder and be a good platform for the Super. The biggest increase will be that of recoil, if that matters. However, I'd be curious to see what the 165g warp speed loadings would cronograph out of the 4" barrel of the 245 as compared to a 5" 1911.
I don't want to discourage you. I'm actually very curious to see some results, but I got to be objective...as much as is humanly possible.
PS: Had SIG left the barrel long and the grip/trigger reach like the 225, I'd buy a couple of 245s.
robert
------------------
"But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip; and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." -Jesus Christ (Luke 22:36, see John 3:15-18)