I was wondering about something.I carry a 1911 for work,but in the summer months i have to wear some kind of covering garment.An over shirt 2 sizes to big etc...I use a strong side galco high ride hip holster.I am right handed by the way.In the winter this is no problem but in the summer when it's 90+ outside i am in no mood to wear any more clothing than i have to.The point i am trying to make is i need a smaller gun for carry.I don't care for the compact 1911 guns.I saw a sig 239 for $395.Is this a good price?It is much lighter and smaller than my 1911.But it is a 40 cal.My main question is this the 40 seems to have more of a snappier recoil than my 1911 does,and more noise also.Is the 40 a high presure round or something?I am sure i could handle a gun in this caliber well if i practice with it.What drew me to the sig 239 most was the one i saw had the best DA trigger i have ever felt.Is this typical of these guns?Is the 40 as good as the old 45ACP?Some say it is but is this acurate?I read that a LEO in Louisiana shot a man in the abdomen who was coming at him with a knife.He used a Sig 229 loaded with 135 gr. COR-BONS.It was reported while the wound was shallow it was extremly wide.The ME reportedly called the ammo company to ask what the hell kind of bullet this was.Does the 40 do well out of shorter barells?As the 239 has a shorter barrel than the 229Is the 40 a good replacement for the 45 ACP?Is there really a big diffrance in the wound made by a .40 cal bullet and a .45 cal bullet?I don't really know much about the 40.Does anyone have a prefered bullet weight in 40.I don't know if i feel comfortable with a 180 gr. bullet.It seems like it must be to slow to expand reliably.Would i be undergunned with the 40 as compared with the 45acp?Any help would be great.Thank You