This topic has been dealt with, at least indirectly, in past threads, but I want your advice on this one directly. The topic is the impact to quality/durability when a .40 S&W is "shoehorned" into a gun designed originally as a 9mm. I suspect that you have to look at the individual model (e.g., the 92/96 Beretta, the Sig 226, etc.) Do the frame or other components become too thin? Is the gun more prone to failure? I am particularly interested in the 96 Beretta, and the Sig 226, but advice on the USP would also be helpful. Thanks in advance.
MLT
MLT