I like mine--
had it for several years and it has been progressively modified, with no intent to do so.
I really hate the MK-III stocks--the needless "thumbrest" prevents easy reach to the mag catch button. The Uncle Mike's rubber stocks are a vast improvement, and I used them for a couple of years. But I really don't care for rubber stocks on a concealment piece--You can usually "burn" a holstered, rubber-stocked pistol pretty easily--The outer garment tends to hang a bit.
I was really looking for a set of black plastic Canadian military stocks and a lanyard ring, to make it (almost) a match for my Inglis 9 mm. A friend gave me a set of the standard commercial blondish wood handles, and it changed the whole appearence of the pistol!
I also ran across a Cylinder & Slide Co. ring-style hammer and had it fitted, with attendant trigger job.
The magazine disconnect went away in the first hour after I took the pistol home.
One point I'd like to make: None of these modifications are really
NEEDED for the .40 BHP to be a really good sidearm. Removal of mag disconnector tends to smooth the trigger pull slightly.
Accuracy on mine has been pretty impressive (to me.)
I've bought a couple of after-market
Mec-Gar magazines--the company that manufactures the Browning mags that are marked "Made in Italy." These do not have the mag ejector spring, but they are also a LOT less money, and they fall free anyhow.
I get along fine with my .45 autos, thank you - - But I just
LIKE this pistol.
You won't regret owning one.
Johnny