Hube and Twoblink,
I have three .357/.38 Special revolvers, two stainless "N" Frame S&W 627s (five-inch barrel with full underlug) and a stainless Ruger KGP-141 (the four-inch barrel , full underlug, GP-100). They are all excellent sidearms -- very accurate, unbelievable reliable and durable, with outstanding design and manufacturing quality.
They (currently the Ruger) are my daily self-defense weapons. I would -- and do -- trust my life and my family's to them; there can be no higher praise, particularly when I also own Sigs, Glocks, Kimbers, and Colts, which I could use as my primary defensive handgun just by removing them from the safe.
Here's why I trust them:
> I (a non-LEO) believe it is most unlikely that I will ever be involved in a grave, immediate defensive scenario that will demand more than six rounds.
> While the reliability of my autoloaders (Sigs and Glocks, for example) is superb, I believe there is even a smaller chance of a failure-to-fire, a jam, or any other mechanical problem with a high-quality, well-maintained revolver.
> I routinely achieve tight groups a 50+ feet with these revolvers.
During the summer, I carry 158 grain, .357 magnum HydraShoks; in the winter, I change this to 125 gain, .357 magnum Cor-Bon loads. I do this to ensure expansion and penetration with through seasonal clothing.
I feel VERY well protected by these handgun/ammo combinations: They are proven, immediate "stoppers", even through home or automotive "barriers".
Certainly, muzzle flash, noise, and over-penetration are issues. However, I will never fire in defense unless this situation is exceptionally dire and urgent. Under those circumstances, I must address "first things first"; preservation of my life and my family's is vastly more important than any other concerns.
The .357 magnum provides this type of superior self-protection. Simply stated the .38 Special, and most other handguns, cannot.
[This message has been edited by RWK (edited August 11, 2000).]