CAUTION: The following post includes loading data beyond or not covered by currently published maximums for this cartridge. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. Neither the writer, The Firing Line, nor the staff of TFL assume any liability for any damage or injury resulting from use of this information.
So I posted a couple days ago about some awesome results I achieved with my CZ452 chambered in 7.62X39. Yesterday I went through he same testing for my M24. I thought I would post some pictures and a minor warning about expensive rifles. Technically the milspec for a rifle to be designated an M24 demands that it shoot .35 MOA for a specified number of fired cartridges. The rifle did fine and I wasn't using the milspec machine rest nor the powder primer and projectiles but I will admit to some disappointment as my $4K worth of rifle kit and my $0.8K worth of rifle kit performed near identically.
On the plus side the M24 should carry out to a few more yards than the Russian round. Also the incomplete polygons and triangles drawn on the groups were my 4 yr old's idea. the hand writing is however mine.
So I posted a couple days ago about some awesome results I achieved with my CZ452 chambered in 7.62X39. Yesterday I went through he same testing for my M24. I thought I would post some pictures and a minor warning about expensive rifles. Technically the milspec for a rifle to be designated an M24 demands that it shoot .35 MOA for a specified number of fired cartridges. The rifle did fine and I wasn't using the milspec machine rest nor the powder primer and projectiles but I will admit to some disappointment as my $4K worth of rifle kit and my $0.8K worth of rifle kit performed near identically.
On the plus side the M24 should carry out to a few more yards than the Russian round. Also the incomplete polygons and triangles drawn on the groups were my 4 yr old's idea. the hand writing is however mine.