I am looking for a bullet that closely approximates the ballistics of a .30 168 gr. Sierra Matchking to deer hunt with. I am looking at the .30 165 gr. Sierra Gameking HPBT and the 165 gr. Ballistic Tip. Have any of you taken deer sized game with either of these bullets. Do you have any other suggestions keeping in mind that I want to be close to the 168 gr Matchking?
.30 165 gr. Sierra HPBT Gameking for Deer?
- Thread starter bernie
- Start date
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
I used the 165 Sierra HPBT for a few years; it didn't kill 'em any deader than the 150s that I went back to. It's certainly a very accurate critter, at least in my rifle. But definitely an effective bullet on deer, in my experience.
, Art
, ArtHi,
Used HPBT for some target shooting,
But I use the SPBT (165) on Deer.
Why? Well The guy I reload with has used the HPBT and SPBT and determined his handloads were SAME POI.
He shot one deer with the HPBT and got a dead deer with .308 in and out holes.
He doesn't get that with SPBT (Spitzer point) so he uses the SPBT for hunting. My rifle using his Handload recipe gets 3 shot groups at 100 yards under an inch, some touching. Good enough accuracy for me (Of course I have to do my part...).
I decided it works well enough for me. I also got the same POI with the HPBT, but I decided to just buy the SPBT. (Joe shoots more than I, so he can buy target and hunting bullets. I just buy the box of SPBT and when it is gone go buy another.)
Did the Dead deer notice what hit it? Probably not. Do you need the HPBT or SPBT? Try them both and see. I just use the SPBT in 165.
YMMV
Gfrey
Used HPBT for some target shooting,
But I use the SPBT (165) on Deer.
Why? Well The guy I reload with has used the HPBT and SPBT and determined his handloads were SAME POI.
He shot one deer with the HPBT and got a dead deer with .308 in and out holes.
He doesn't get that with SPBT (Spitzer point) so he uses the SPBT for hunting. My rifle using his Handload recipe gets 3 shot groups at 100 yards under an inch, some touching. Good enough accuracy for me (Of course I have to do my part...).
I decided it works well enough for me. I also got the same POI with the HPBT, but I decided to just buy the SPBT. (Joe shoots more than I, so he can buy target and hunting bullets. I just buy the box of SPBT and when it is gone go buy another.)
Did the Dead deer notice what hit it? Probably not. Do you need the HPBT or SPBT? Try them both and see. I just use the SPBT in 165.
YMMV
Gfrey
gfrey: reading your post, I think that there may be some confusion. There are 3 Sierra bullets in that weight range for the .30 cal.: 168 gr. HPBT Matchking, 165 gr. Sp. Gameking, and a 165 gr. HPBT Gameking. When you said you were shooting the 165 HPBT at targets, did you mean the Matchking bullet? That is not intended to be used on game. I am specifically asking about the 165 gr. HPBT Gameking bullet. It has a wider, cross shaped hollowpoint on it, not the tiny hole that is on the Matchkings as a result of the manufacturing process. If anything, I was afraid the 165 hpbt Gameking might be a bit "explosive" and might not offer enough penetration. Thanks.
Bernie,
I know there are 3 bulltets, the 168 MATCHKING hollow point (I have NEVER USED IT)
The 165 gr HPBT AND the 165 gr SPBT. (I HAVE used these two.)
Joe found in his tests that these two performed to same POI. His in the field experience with the 165 gr HPBT showed one dead deer with a .308 entry hole and a .308 exit hole. he relegated the 165gr HPBT to target only status, and he and I use 165gr SPBT on deer.
Hope that clears it up.
Gfrey
I know there are 3 bulltets, the 168 MATCHKING hollow point (I have NEVER USED IT)
The 165 gr HPBT AND the 165 gr SPBT. (I HAVE used these two.)
Joe found in his tests that these two performed to same POI. His in the field experience with the 165 gr HPBT showed one dead deer with a .308 entry hole and a .308 exit hole. he relegated the 165gr HPBT to target only status, and he and I use 165gr SPBT on deer.
Hope that clears it up.
Gfrey
Johnny Guest
Moderator in Memoriam
Roger on the three bullets. - - -
To try and simplify the matter, I presume, Sierra terms their 165 Game Kings the 165 BTHP and the 165 SBT (Spitzer Boat Tail.) It has also been my experience that both shoot to the same point of aim. One might figure that the more pointy SBT MIGHT perform better at extreme ranges than the wider-open HPBT bullet, but I never tested them beyond 300 yards.
I know the 168 MATCHking BTHP has long been considered THE long range target load. As mentioned above, though, it is not intended for humane hunting use. The construction of the bullet does not lend itself to proper expansion. The hollow point is just a means of allowing for a perfect base. I have never shot it at game. In other threads, people have commented that THEY have killed game with this bullet. Okay--You can also kill game with FMJ bullets, if placed exactly right. So what? I want to kill a game animal as cleanly as possible, and this means with a sporting bullet.
I have no documentation for this but, I believe the 165 HPBT MAY be a bit more heavily constructed than the 165 SBT. I've killed quite a few Hill country white tails with this bullet but only one bear--400-lb Black--and a couple of good size wild hogs. I used a .30-06 Ruger M77, first with IMR 4064 powder, and then switched to a stoutish-but-not-max charge of IMR 4350. I dare say none of the animals knew the difference.
Good luch--
Johnny
To try and simplify the matter, I presume, Sierra terms their 165 Game Kings the 165 BTHP and the 165 SBT (Spitzer Boat Tail.) It has also been my experience that both shoot to the same point of aim. One might figure that the more pointy SBT MIGHT perform better at extreme ranges than the wider-open HPBT bullet, but I never tested them beyond 300 yards.
I know the 168 MATCHking BTHP has long been considered THE long range target load. As mentioned above, though, it is not intended for humane hunting use. The construction of the bullet does not lend itself to proper expansion. The hollow point is just a means of allowing for a perfect base. I have never shot it at game. In other threads, people have commented that THEY have killed game with this bullet. Okay--You can also kill game with FMJ bullets, if placed exactly right. So what? I want to kill a game animal as cleanly as possible, and this means with a sporting bullet.
I have no documentation for this but, I believe the 165 HPBT MAY be a bit more heavily constructed than the 165 SBT. I've killed quite a few Hill country white tails with this bullet but only one bear--400-lb Black--and a couple of good size wild hogs. I used a .30-06 Ruger M77, first with IMR 4064 powder, and then switched to a stoutish-but-not-max charge of IMR 4350. I dare say none of the animals knew the difference.
Good luch--
Johnny
Al Thompson
Staff Alumnus
Bernie, I have close friends who swear "at" and "by" the 165 HPBT. I suspect this bullet has a high velocity "floor" for expansion. That would account for the radical differences in opinions around here.
Didn't want to be the only one mentioning the 165 HPBT's lack of expansion. Especially as I have never shot a critter with one.
Didn't want to be the only one mentioning the 165 HPBT's lack of expansion. Especially as I have never shot a critter with one.
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
At close range from an '06 the 165 HPBT can be devastating. I shot an 80-lb. dressed-weight doe from a tree stand at about 50 yards. I was holding for a neck shot, and she took a step just as I touched off. Angling down, the bullet went through the top of the right shoulder, under the spine and out the middle of the off shoulder.
Sorta like a Peckinpaugh movie. It blew out a big red gout of goop; the top of the leg bone and a bunch of stuff with it. Regardless, she reared, spun, and three-legged it for maybe 75 yards, leaving a foot-wide blood trail. Fist-sized exit wound.
I shot a little buck through the neck, and didn't realize how he was standing in the brush. The bullet went on into a ham and ruined it.
I've shot other deer with that load, but mostly out around 100 to 150 yards. Always an exit wound on deer to dressed weights of 120 pounds, from body shots, but less devastation.
That bullet is definitely a mean motor-scooter.
Art
Sorta like a Peckinpaugh movie. It blew out a big red gout of goop; the top of the leg bone and a bunch of stuff with it. Regardless, she reared, spun, and three-legged it for maybe 75 yards, leaving a foot-wide blood trail. Fist-sized exit wound.
I shot a little buck through the neck, and didn't realize how he was standing in the brush. The bullet went on into a ham and ruined it.
I've shot other deer with that load, but mostly out around 100 to 150 yards. Always an exit wound on deer to dressed weights of 120 pounds, from body shots, but less devastation.
That bullet is definitely a mean motor-scooter.
Art
Bottom Gun
New member
I've used the 165 BTHP Gameking for 20+ years in my 30/06 when I hunt deer. It performs very well. I seldom use anything else.
Don't use it for anything larger than deer though. It doesn't work very well on elk.
Don't use it for anything larger than deer though. It doesn't work very well on elk.
Johnny Guest
Moderator in Memoriam
Opinions are a dime a dozen, I know, but - - -
When working up elk loads for Elder Son's .300 WinMag a few years back, we made a couple of calls to the Sierra technical assistance 800- number, and we'd pretty well settled on the 180 SBT GameKing. I was contemplating use of the same bullet in my .30-06, to take along as a spare rifle. I mentioned to the technician that I'd been well impressed with the 165 GKs on deer. He strongly suggested that I use the same load on elk, and not go to the 180. Said that the 180 is a strongly constructed bullet, and, especially at longer ranges, would not perform nearly as well at '06 velocities as the 165.
He went on to make clear he was speaking of the 165 GameKing, and NOT the 168. I told him I'd read the same suggestions elsewhere. He said they had done further testing, after initial poor results, and made clear: Typically, the match bullet striking a game animal simply collapses the front end with little true expansion, the bullet turns and breaks in two. Loads with the 168 MK are well-thought-of by military and police marksmen, because of the pin-point accuracy capability at any range. But, clearly, for antipersonnel use, uniform expansion and penetration are secondary considerations.
Respect for a game animal demands that we make an effort to ensure instant kills whenever possible. I strongly urge you to use a good game bullet for sporting use.
bernie - - In re-reading your topic-opener post, I see you don't mention the cartridge in which you intend to load the bullet. Most of what I've written about the '06 would apply to the .308 as well.
Best of luck,
Johnny
When working up elk loads for Elder Son's .300 WinMag a few years back, we made a couple of calls to the Sierra technical assistance 800- number, and we'd pretty well settled on the 180 SBT GameKing. I was contemplating use of the same bullet in my .30-06, to take along as a spare rifle. I mentioned to the technician that I'd been well impressed with the 165 GKs on deer. He strongly suggested that I use the same load on elk, and not go to the 180. Said that the 180 is a strongly constructed bullet, and, especially at longer ranges, would not perform nearly as well at '06 velocities as the 165.
He went on to make clear he was speaking of the 165 GameKing, and NOT the 168. I told him I'd read the same suggestions elsewhere. He said they had done further testing, after initial poor results, and made clear: Typically, the match bullet striking a game animal simply collapses the front end with little true expansion, the bullet turns and breaks in two. Loads with the 168 MK are well-thought-of by military and police marksmen, because of the pin-point accuracy capability at any range. But, clearly, for antipersonnel use, uniform expansion and penetration are secondary considerations.
Respect for a game animal demands that we make an effort to ensure instant kills whenever possible. I strongly urge you to use a good game bullet for sporting use.
bernie - - In re-reading your topic-opener post, I see you don't mention the cartridge in which you intend to load the bullet. Most of what I've written about the '06 would apply to the .308 as well.
Best of luck,
Johnny
I don't know if Siera has made any changes in the 165 gr. HPBT, but during one deer hunt back in 1978 I shot a coyote at roughly 200 yards with one. (Hides were selling for as much as $100 each back then.) When I got to that yodel dog, I found a two piece animal. One ruined hide and a bullet I figured would be too destructive on deer. I picked up a box of Remington core locks to finish out my hunt, and used the rest of those loads on targets. Haven't used them since. The one 165 gr. bullet I really like is the Speer SPFB. I've been using it in one .308 rifle I have because it it the only bullet in that weight range it will shoot accurately. (Really fussy rifle, a Ruger 77 RSI) It will penetrate and hold
together well. One deer that was facing me had the bullet penetrate to the right rear ham, after bouncing off the spine, a few ribs, and breaking the right rear leg bone before stopping. Bullet still had 65 percent of it's weight remaining. That's good enough for me. All the ohter deer I've used that bullet on were more or less braodside and the bullets penetrated all the way through. No deer went more than 30 feet after being hit.
Good bullet in my estimation. I'm going to try some in my 30-06 this year, if I draw a tag.
Paul B.
together well. One deer that was facing me had the bullet penetrate to the right rear ham, after bouncing off the spine, a few ribs, and breaking the right rear leg bone before stopping. Bullet still had 65 percent of it's weight remaining. That's good enough for me. All the ohter deer I've used that bullet on were more or less braodside and the bullets penetrated all the way through. No deer went more than 30 feet after being hit.
Good bullet in my estimation. I'm going to try some in my 30-06 this year, if I draw a tag.
Paul B.
I've yet to use the 165 Sierra SBT Gameking on anything. I do, however, use the 180 flavor for "the old stand-by" on elk - .30-06
I did a decent enough write-up on it a few months back when the GameKing subject came up. We've taken quite a few elk with the 180 with excellent results.
On deer, 165s, of either flavor, should do quite well at .308/.30-06 velocities - depending on the range. All our 180 use was within 200 yards - & all but that one was in the under 40 yard range.
I loaded a bunch of the 165 HPBT GameKings for a bud but have yet to get a field report - maybe this year.
Sierra's book says that the 165 HP & SP can be used interchangably - for hunting. I'd think either would do the .308/.30-06 job wonderfully, but may even go to the 150 (or 130) for "just" deer.
I have used the Nosler BT 165 in a short-barreled .308 - once. Ended up shooting that poor (~110 pound) doe 5X times before she croaked at my feet. All good shot placement, all bullets penetrated & expanded as advertised - she just didn't want to expire cleanly. Certainly wasn't the fault of the bullet far as I could tell.
Excellent accuracy (the best) with the Nosler BTs & second best with the Sierras - either will do deer or elk all day long. Still, I'm sold on the Sierras - soft point.
I did a decent enough write-up on it a few months back when the GameKing subject came up. We've taken quite a few elk with the 180 with excellent results.
On deer, 165s, of either flavor, should do quite well at .308/.30-06 velocities - depending on the range. All our 180 use was within 200 yards - & all but that one was in the under 40 yard range.
I loaded a bunch of the 165 HPBT GameKings for a bud but have yet to get a field report - maybe this year.
Sierra's book says that the 165 HP & SP can be used interchangably - for hunting. I'd think either would do the .308/.30-06 job wonderfully, but may even go to the 150 (or 130) for "just" deer.
I have used the Nosler BT 165 in a short-barreled .308 - once. Ended up shooting that poor (~110 pound) doe 5X times before she croaked at my feet. All good shot placement, all bullets penetrated & expanded as advertised - she just didn't want to expire cleanly. Certainly wasn't the fault of the bullet far as I could tell.
Excellent accuracy (the best) with the Nosler BTs & second best with the Sierras - either will do deer or elk all day long. Still, I'm sold on the Sierras - soft point.
Johnny Guest
Moderator in Memoriam
That WAS an interesting topic previously - -
- - and well worth searching out. Labgrade wrote,
And another pal loves the old Speer 130 HP in all his .30 calibers. He works up to superfast loads and it goes like a laser. Says he loves to hunt deer, and shoot deer, but hates to TRACK deer.
Isn't it nice we have all these choices, confusing though they may be?
Bes,
Johnny Guest
- - and well worth searching out. Labgrade wrote,
I long ago sstandardized on the 165 for all around use in '06, but some guys whose judgement I really respect like the 150 for deer and antelope--Most especially Art Eatman, the esteemed moderator. Art has this L O O O N G barrelled and uses 150s to shoots stuff so far out that I can barely find it with a scope!
And another pal loves the old Speer 130 HP in all his .30 calibers. He works up to superfast loads and it goes like a laser. Says he loves to hunt deer, and shoot deer, but hates to TRACK deer.
Isn't it nice we have all these choices, confusing though they may be?
Bes,
Johnny Guest
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
This started with specific concern for comparable trajectories, so I stayed with that in earlier posts.
IMO, for deer which field-dress under 200 pounds, I see no particular reason to use a .30 bullet which weighs over 150 grains. More IMO is that I think a flat-based bullet, particularly a spitzer, will do just fine out to at least 300 yards. After that the shooter's skill becomes far more important than differences in bullet weight or design.
In a previous discussion here about bullet design, a Sierra person posted information to the general effect that the flat-based spitzer bullets are less likely to "blow up" than the boat-tails. This comment was limited to the 150-grain and 165-grain bullets. If I understood correctly, the blow-up problem is not evident with the 180-grain boat-tail or flat-base designs.
There is an operating range of velocities for different weights and styles of bullets. Some bullets, if hitting a deer at 40 to 75 yards, will blow up, but out beyond 100 yards will not. You just have to dig in to what information is available from the manufacturers as to the design parameters for your particular needs and purpose.
You can email Sierra, and they will get back to you within a reasonable time. I haven't tried any of the others.
Art
IMO, for deer which field-dress under 200 pounds, I see no particular reason to use a .30 bullet which weighs over 150 grains. More IMO is that I think a flat-based bullet, particularly a spitzer, will do just fine out to at least 300 yards. After that the shooter's skill becomes far more important than differences in bullet weight or design.
In a previous discussion here about bullet design, a Sierra person posted information to the general effect that the flat-based spitzer bullets are less likely to "blow up" than the boat-tails. This comment was limited to the 150-grain and 165-grain bullets. If I understood correctly, the blow-up problem is not evident with the 180-grain boat-tail or flat-base designs.
There is an operating range of velocities for different weights and styles of bullets. Some bullets, if hitting a deer at 40 to 75 yards, will blow up, but out beyond 100 yards will not. You just have to dig in to what information is available from the manufacturers as to the design parameters for your particular needs and purpose.
You can email Sierra, and they will get back to you within a reasonable time. I haven't tried any of the others.
Art
the 165 Gameking is a wonderful performer on deer at .308/.30-06 velocities. early on in my reloading adventures I found this bullet shot splendid groups in my .300mag and foolishly tried it on a big northern MN buck deer. killed him very dead right where he stood but the bullet blew up horribly. Sierra cautions about this so my fault not thiers.