30-06 VRS 300 win mag

scottaz

Inactive
How much of a difference is there really between the two. THis would be my only big game gun used on anything pretty much from javelina to elk. IS there a big difference in recoil. Wondering if the mags worth it. the recoil isnt a real big issue but dont want to get killed by it.
 
IIRC, the .300 is about 20% more recoil than an '06. The .300 is not a lot of fun for a lengthy session on a bench rest, but in a hunting situation it's no big deal.

IMO, the .300 would probably give you another 100 to 150 yards of useful range, compared to the '06. You gotta work out your own skill level for field-shooting accuracy and confidence--nobody else can tell you. For elk, I'd say the '06 oughta be a 250-yards or so reliable killer. I've made one-shot kills on whitetails to 350 and 450, but I've been shooting the same rifle for several decades.

The next thing to consider is how much of what type shooting would you be doing? If elk hunting is occasional, but varmint-sized stuff and deer are more frequent, I'd probably go with the '06.

FWIW, Art
 
The .300 Win Mag should give you an additional 100 yards effective range. If you hand load, this becomes a no-brainer; buy the .300 and handload down for lighter game. I hane a gaggle of .30-06s but the .300 Win Mag is my favorite caliber. Last elk was at 444 yards certifiable by a licensed Coloardo guide with a rangefinder!
 
Back
Top