"I would love to buy a Remington 700 but I just want a longer barrel than that 22 inch with the irons. They only make the 24 inch for the ones optics ready. I know there may be a ballistic reason but every time I pick one of those up I just feel it's a little short. And then I can't get past that horrid gloss stock on the BDL. Are there any options out there? I am not all that concerned about price as I am with feel, look. I know I must sound like a woman picking the car with her favorite color but this is just the way it is."
I hear you. I too hate that glossy bowling ball finish on the 700 BDL. Solution? Get some 0000 steel wool and gently rub that finish into a very nice semi-gloss finish that looks great. That's what I did on mine.
I agree with you as well on a 24" barrel and my custom Mauser in 30-06 has a 24" barrel. My .300 magnums have 26" barrels.
I think the deal on 22" barrels come from some of what I've seen in some of the late Jack O'Connor's writings. He constantly preached two things, the .20 Win. and his preference for 22" barrels and lighter weight rifles. O have a commercial FN Mauser in .270 Win. from the early 1950's. It has a 24" barrel and the gun with scope weighs almost 10 pounds. They made them heavy back then.
I have another FN Mauser with 24" barrel made aoround 1975 that weighs with scope 7.5 pounds so you can make them lighter.
Several of my custom rifles have 23" barrels. I dare to be different.
I guess if you really want an M700 with a 24" barel; you could order one from their custom shop and also order a semi-gloss finish for the stock.
Frankly, I've been hearing some pretty ugly things about the quality of the current Remington rifles. I haven't ought a new rifle in several years but that might be worth researching. It's a sad thing when some conglomerate corporations takes over a company making a good product, then turning the beak counters loose in order to recoup their money as quickly as possible and destroying the product's reputation. Frankly, if I were to consider buying another Remington 700, I'd be looking at one from the mid 80's or earlier, preferably earlier. Apparently from the comments I've been seeing, this is what is happening not only to Remington but Marlin.
Paul B.