3-4 rounds average per gunfight. Still true?

FerFAL

New member
Just happened to read Erick Gelhaus’s post “The pendulm (and scythe) are swinging ... Heed the warning.”

Being sincere here, I clicked on it thinking that it referred to the hard financial times USA is going through, and that it had security advice in that regard. My mistake.
Still, I got to read his warning regarding senseless discussions, so its good to remind people about it before posts evolve into urinating championships.

I’m making this post because I just got off the phone, after talking with a friend of mine.

We talked about the current situation our country is going through, the food shortages and empty shelves, and how long things will hold on until people get desperate.

As an afterthought she mentioned that some robbers attacked her father and his girlfriend (divorced) while they watched over her recently married sister’s home, while she was in her honeymoon.

I always try to learn as much detail as I can from these situations.
As usual, 3 armed men intercepted the couple when they arrived to the sister’s house, when they were getting out of the car.

Then, three more guys showed up, each driving a car!
They tied them up, loaded the cars full of the newly wedded couple’s gifts, everything they had was soon fitted into the cars.
After that, one of the bad guys cut the cable off an appliance, stripped the end of the cable, and threatened to torture them with electric shocks.
There was also some money in the house, about $ 1000, and fortunately they didn’t fulfill the threat.

When I hear about such incidents, which unfortunately happen very often, I’ve noticed that most of the time, at least 2 or 3 criminals are involved, probably 4 of more. I seldom hear of armed criminals working solo, with the exception of rapists.

Understanding this context, I can’t help but to remember how ill fitted the 3-4 round average per self defense shooting is these days.

This supposed average has been around for decades.
Got to wonder, is it still accurate?

Aside from some murders when only one shot is fired into an unlucky person ( I don’t consider those gunfights) when gun fights do occur, much more rounds are fired.
30-40 rounds in a gunfight last week, and not long ago a cop told me about one they had against 5 or 6 bad guys where 50-60 rounds where fired.
When you have an average of 3 criminals armed with 15 round pistols, it’s easy to see how the firepower required can easily exceed the supposed 3 or 4 average.

In a perfect world, internet commandos with nerves of steel are 100% sure that they will land each and ever shot in the heart or head of their attackers.

In a less perfect world, but a more realistic one, people like Jeanne Assam fire 10 shots to stop a single attacker.

So, the question is pretty simple; do you think that it is wise to expect to shoot just 3 or 4 rounds, or should you have a weapon with more capacity just in case that average no longer holds truth, or you just happen to be one of those that don’t trust luck when it comes to falling within favorable odds.
It would be great if we could have a mature discussion here guys. Data from real gunfights would be good too.

FerFAL
 
FerFAL, . . . in 1966, . . . in Saigon, . . . a smart aleck gunner handed me an M1 Garand, . . . and one bandolier of ammo (8 ea, 8 round clips) and sent me on my way.

I have been wary ever since of being caught somewhere without enough ammo, . . . so I carry at least one spare magazine for whatever auto I have on me at the time, . . . and as often as not, . . . I carry 2 spare mags.

If I am out of town, . . . I have 3 spare mags, . . . and maybe even a full box of ammo, . . . just in case I get to go shooting somewhere.

No, . . . I don't believe that 2 or 3 or 4 rounds would be enough in a real life confrontation.

May God bless,
Dwight
 
It depends on what "shootings" you're looking at. If you include LEO shootings, the number of rounds is probably greater than 5. If you include criminal shootings (drive-bys, revenge, etc.) the number is also probably greater. But, if you look at civilian defensive shootings at home and at work that number is probably still true (here in the US anyway). Even in multiple assailant confrontations.
 
3 to 4 rounds per each gun fight

ferFAL,

the way this stat was first used was to describe each gunfight incident for NYPD. NYPD has gathered gunfight data for their officers since the 1890's had this information has been passed to and fro ever since.

the key to this part of the data is that the event you described would have been broken down into each individual shooting sequence and analyzed separately, this is where the mean average of 3 to 4 shots per engagement came from.

hope this helps,

Good luck and be safe.
 
Yes, 3-4 shots per person - per gunfight remains about the average across the board.

Below is a data example from a NYPD, SOP9 police combat analysis report that supports the 3-4 shot claim.

Obviously, it's not representative of all gunfights, but it is a microcosm of big city shootings involving both on and off duty police vs civilians.
Part of your answer lies in this legitimate data. There's plenty more data out there that supports the 3-4 shot average for all types of shootings.

Research it yourself, but if the data/opinion is not legitimately documented.....totally ignore it.

NYPD SOP 9 - ANALYSIS OF POLICE COMBAT
In 1969, the Firearms and Tactics Section of the New York City Police Department instituted a procedure for the in-depth documentation and study of police combat situations. It was designated Department Order SOP 9.
Data gathering began in January 1970, and over 6000 cases were studied during the 1970s. The study results and findings were released in 1981.

FIREARMS DISCHARGE ASSAULT REPORT 1992

GUNFIGHTS STATISTICS:

Total: 76 (27% of shooting incidents)

Total number of MOS involved on duty: 151 Off duty: 11
Total number of shots fired by MOS: 583
Total number of hits by MOS: 96
Hit potential 17%
Shots per incident 7.7
Shots by MOS per incident 3.6
Total number of perpetrators involved 87
Total number of shots fired by perps 257
Total number of hits by perpetrators 17
Hit potential 7%
Average shots by perps per incident 3.0

MEMBERS ACCURACY AT DISTANCES FIRED DURING GUNFIGHTS:

TOTAL SHOTS HITS POTENTIAL


Less than 3 yards 9 79 22 28%
3 - 7 yards 20 141 15 11%
7- 15 yards 19 120 5 4.2%
15- 25 yards 9 44 1 2.3%
Over 25 yards 3 14 1 7.1%
Undetermined 22 185 52 28.1%

IN 5 INCIDENTS M.O.S FIRED FROM 6 DIFFERENT DISTANCES

In 1992, 48% of all gunfights of a known distance occurred at 7 yards or less, compared to 58% in 1991.

perpetrators killed: 6
perpetrators wounded: 27
 
Skyguy and Scattergun Bob are correct.
The original NYPD SOP9 dat were collected when the NYPD was for the most part using revolvers. Thgey have been updated since the switch to 9mm semiautos.
Interestingly, the average no. of shots fired to terminate a police-perp encounter by NYPD officers has gone up to 6.9
BUT

In 1990 the overall police hit potential was 19%.
In 1992 the overall police hit potential was 17%.
And in 2000, when semiauto's were in widespread use, the average hit potential was...
Less than 9%.

So, it would seem that use of higher capacity handguns has increased the number of shots fired per incident, but the probability of hit per shots fired has significantly decreased.

The original NYPD SOP9 finding that shot placement is the single most important factor in ending a gunfight remains true.
So, in actual police shootings the data show:
shooting more does not increase hit potential;
shooting 3-4 shots is adequate if placement is good.

C
 
At first I'd think it's weird the percentage of hits went down so far but...

Have any of you fired a NYPD Glock 19? They have NY-2 triggers. I've fired one so set up and it's awfull. Two, when you fire more rounds, I'd expect more misses for the simple reason if it's hard to connect with one shot, then it will be harder to connect with 6 or 7! And also when more than one cop fires, well then several 15 shot pistols are firing and that's a lot of lead in the air.

In Dallas about 10 years a go three cops stopped a shotgun welding man. The BG got out of his pickup and pointed the shotgun at the cops (bad move that.) Well they fired something like 107 rounds. Hit him 11 times I think (not seriously!!!!!) Some of the rounds hit houses behind him, some hit is truck, others it signs and trees.

So I can see both the number of shots going up and the hit rate going down.
 
Reality!

Instead of allowing antiquated/unrepresentative "data" to guide how many shots one should be prepared to use in defense of his/her LIFE, why not take REALITY as a guide? What types of weapons do gang members, say, use in their crimes? How commonly are 9mm weapons available and used by criminals?

Common sense, I imagine, is arguably that most potent "weapon" in self defense.
 
The real question is..."Do you trust your life to averages?" It only takes one instance of being that statistical outlier...

Look at virtually any of the mass shootings. VT and NIU have huge student populations of 25,000+. Unfortunately, the statistics totally failed 32 and 5 students, respectively.
 
Well guys look at it this way. I havn't had a flat on my car in something like 20 years, so should I haul around that extra weight and burn up more gas? On the average....

Or should I put in a fire alarm in my house as so few per 1000 homes get burned down?

Should I have health insurance since most people don't get so sick they would spend on medical care what the insurance cost for many years!

Ok, the chances of needing a weapon to defend your self are actually low. The chance you will have to actually fire the weapon is lower still. And the chance you will have to fire LOTS of ammo very remote. But as for how far you need to prepare.... that's up to you.

I drew the line with my Glock 27 (11 rounds), spare mag (10 rounds) and Centinial .38 (5 rounds.) Plus lots and lots of H2H training (it's my avocation.) Will I need it? Probably not. Will it be enough? I sure hope so!
 
Average DGU - no shots fired. Don't carry ammo!

or

Take stat classes and research design and learn more than just how to calculate an average. :D
 
Exactly Glenn.

Never seen violence at my church in 50+ years. BUT we do read of it happening. Never seen violence at my workplace, but we do read of it happening.

Hope I go through life with no problems, but I know they happen to!
 
Whenever someone drags out that old chestnut - "Most gunfights are only 3 or 4 rounds" - to justify not carrying reloads, my response is always "Unless they're not. Then what are you gonna do?"

I carry multiple reloads more for the fact that the magazine is the weak point in any semi auto handgun system than any expectation of getting in a long running gun battle. My rule of thumb is 4 reloads for single stacks, 2 for double stacks, minimum.

The only time you can have too much ammo is when you're swimming.

Joe
 
Can't agree more!

Deaf Smith, I can't agree more with your input. Excellent - in my opinion. One keeps hearing the pathetic - if not asinine - remark after a home invasion etc., "We NEVER had such an incident in OUR neighborhood!" Even heaven is NOT criminal-safe for the devil dwelt there once upon a time.

And, Raytracer, I like the bit about "The only time you can have too much ammo is when you're swimming." :)
 
In case of the ultimate...

But let's say the ultimate does occur and a criminal is shot dead, and the police finds the shooter [the would-be victim] with a "Glock 27 (11 rounds), spare mag (10 rounds) and Centinial .38 (5 rounds.)" - an "arsenal" as an attorney might describe it to a Clinton-minded jury. Would not the "weaponry" injure the would-be victim who defended himself/herself?
 
That's been asked and answered - will it hurt me in court?

Most of the opinions offered will be non-expert. I suggest one search on the issue to avoid repetitive prose.

The basic answer is:

1. Weapons related issues can influence juries.
2. They don't have to be explicitly raised, just appearance will do it. So you won't see it in the legal databases.
3. The influence interacts with jury knowledge, gender, expert testimony, etc.
4. Your lawyer and experts can help defuse such at trial
5. Someone will say - It doesn't matter if it is a good shoot. However, if you in a trial - someone thinks it isn't a good shoot.

I wouldn't not carry standard stuff because of the court fear. Avoid being seen as mall ninja, raving killer. Shut up about that stuff. Have a lawyer who knows such. Or experts.
 
Fortunately we don't see many multiple BG situations here in America. Most seem to be 1-2 perps invading a house or holding someone up on the street.

So in those instances, when fired upon the BG typically runs off (from what I've read). You won't hear about 2-3 magazine tactical reloads much in the US other than LEO situations.

Even heaven is NOT criminal-safe for the devil dwelt there once upon a time.

Not exactly.
 
I your rush to dismiss the data...

You have again played right into FerFAL and his continued crusade for high capacity handguns. I see the wisdom of Mr Benzene, Mr Raimius, Mr Meyer, and Mr Raytracer. HOWEVER, gentleman in your rush to agree with FerFAL you overlooked the true issue. Is the data that supports officer involved shooting "and it is current data" valid in relation to civilian shooting incidents? The answer is no, only those small number of times that LEO personal are truly surprised does the data have merit.

Mr Meyer, you made some discourteous remark about learning better stats, yet supply none to support you claim! Please I am willing to read any data that is available provided it is legitimate. THAT IS THE PROBLEM, besides LE data collected and rigorously tested no solid information exists. Self-conceived reality, I heard about, and I think it happened this way are not the stuff to base a strategy on.

Frankly, I try to stay out of these discussions, how many rounds and how many predators and how many reloads don't matter much. What really matters to me is to use what I have available with decisiveness and aggressiveness, and to keep thinking through the fight.

To FerFAL I say enough you win, only a fool would take less ammo than was needed to win the firefight. So how many rounds is that SIR.

Good Luck, Be Safe
 
IMHO most people will run out of time before they run out of bullets.

To me it's the person behind the gun more than what gun is used. I feel equally comfortable with my Glock 19 as I do with my Ruger GP100, yet the Glock has much more ammo and a faster reload.

I carry the Ruger more than the Glock.

Biker
 
I carry multiple reloads more for the fact that the magazine is the weak point in any semi auto handgun system than any expectation of getting in a long running gun battle. My rule of thumb is 4 reloads for single stacks, 2 for double stacks, minimum.

Some of you guys carry more ammo on your person just going back and forth to the john than a lot of cops who are far more likely to need their firearm . . .

Amazingly, I survived years of undercover work in some pretty nasty organizations with nothing more than a Model 19 2 1/2" and no reloads.

Jeff
 
Back
Top