I received this from a Ranger buddy of mine. Please indulge me for a moment and consider the following.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>
All,
Every know and then a "cause" comes up that effects each of us in
many ways, not one to usually get involved this time I feel compelled. As
you may or may not know the Chief of Staff of the Army in effort to raise
morale has decided to make the Black Beret a symbol of excellence worn by
the Army Rangers since 1950, the issue headgear for the entire Army. As
friends, family and co-workers you can imagine how this would make active
and former Rangers feel. While I am sure everyone would support the Chief
of Staff of the Army's (CSA's) intent many of us probably feel that this is
not the way to execute it. The 75th Ranger Regiment has an official order
placed upon it not to comment. I would like to appeal to you all to send a
letter or postcard to either the CSA or his boss the Secretary of the Army
and let them know that the planned cure to raise morale could do much
greater harm to the 2268 Rangers that make of the finest Airborne Infantry
Regiment in the world, not to mention the potential Rangers who have not
gone there yet. Take a moment write down you thoughts and let them know.
If you know a veteran or interested party please let them know. I
personally thank you.
Gen. Eric Shinseki
Chief of Staff, Army
200 Army Pentagon
Washington, D.C. 20310-0200
Honorable Louis Caldera
Secretary of the Army
101 Army Pentagon
Washington, D.C. 20310-0101
[/quote]
------------------
~USP
"[Even if there would be] few tears shed if and when the Second Amendment is held to guarantee nothing more than the state National Guard, this would simply show that the Founders were right when they feared that some future generation might wish to abandon liberties that they considered essential, and so sought to protect those liberties in a Bill of Rights. We may tolerate the abridgement of property rights and the elimination of a right to bear arms; but we should not pretend that these are not reductions of rights." -- Justice Scalia 1998
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>
All,
Every know and then a "cause" comes up that effects each of us in
many ways, not one to usually get involved this time I feel compelled. As
you may or may not know the Chief of Staff of the Army in effort to raise
morale has decided to make the Black Beret a symbol of excellence worn by
the Army Rangers since 1950, the issue headgear for the entire Army. As
friends, family and co-workers you can imagine how this would make active
and former Rangers feel. While I am sure everyone would support the Chief
of Staff of the Army's (CSA's) intent many of us probably feel that this is
not the way to execute it. The 75th Ranger Regiment has an official order
placed upon it not to comment. I would like to appeal to you all to send a
letter or postcard to either the CSA or his boss the Secretary of the Army
and let them know that the planned cure to raise morale could do much
greater harm to the 2268 Rangers that make of the finest Airborne Infantry
Regiment in the world, not to mention the potential Rangers who have not
gone there yet. Take a moment write down you thoughts and let them know.
If you know a veteran or interested party please let them know. I
personally thank you.
Gen. Eric Shinseki
Chief of Staff, Army
200 Army Pentagon
Washington, D.C. 20310-0200
Honorable Louis Caldera
Secretary of the Army
101 Army Pentagon
Washington, D.C. 20310-0101
[/quote]
------------------
~USP
"[Even if there would be] few tears shed if and when the Second Amendment is held to guarantee nothing more than the state National Guard, this would simply show that the Founders were right when they feared that some future generation might wish to abandon liberties that they considered essential, and so sought to protect those liberties in a Bill of Rights. We may tolerate the abridgement of property rights and the elimination of a right to bear arms; but we should not pretend that these are not reductions of rights." -- Justice Scalia 1998