.223 vs. .270

[warbirdlover]

Never mind. Just kidding...

 

[trg42wraglefragle]

neither 6.5 grendel.
Shoots like a laser out to 3000yards, doesn't have any wind drift and hits like a 50bmg

 

[emcon5]

How about .17 Remington vs .30-378 Lapua?

 

[Marquezj16]

you got me...I was curious, very curious of the question.

 

[hoffbill]

1 on each shoulder

 

[Brian Pfleuger]

No, no, no.

.25-Souper vs .25-06

 

[briandg]

this could have been funnier if it was serious.

I opened it looking for page after page of people spitting their oatmeal in outrage at this fool question.

 

[johnmcgowan]

as the girls say in the ghetto....Oh No he ditundt!
Go get um Jerry!! LOL

 

[emcon5]

What about .244 Remington vs 6mm Remington?

Or my personal favorite, 256 Newton vs 6.5-06?

 

[Irish B]

.458 win mag vs .450 ne?

 

[Jim243]

No, No, No it is the 6.8 SPC vs the .270 or maybe the .308 vs the 30-06?


Jim

 

[bluetopper]

But is the extra recoil and expense of ammo worth the 270 over the 223?

 

[AZAK]

.223 vs. .270

It's obvious:

.270 is a bigger number, and we all know that "bigger is better"; however, .223 is more accurate, as we all know that the number .223 is "closer to zero" than .270.

 

[Jimro]

Which is better again, 223 or 5.56?

Jimro

 

[bigghoss]

You missed a golden opportunity for a rickroll.

 

[ripnbst]

.270 is more versatile.

 

[warbirdlover]

Thank you all. I enjoyed this.

 

[shurshot]

Jack O'Connor and millions of old school hunters from 1925 on, are rolling in their graves at this one.............Laughing!