cervri,
The 0.050 difference between the trim to length of 1.750 and your 1.700 trim is just about the breadth of 11 sheets of copy paper. Your trim length is less then 2.9% shorter than the trim to case length and 1% off the minimum SAAMI trim length.
Using a 52 grain SMK bullet seated at 2.250 OAL with H335 powder in the middle of the pressure range, the difference in a 0.05 case trim length results in a difference of only 26 fps in velocity at 3161 fps (0.07%) and would be about the same as a 0.2 grain reduction in the powder load. The pressure difference would be 1577 psi out of 44115 psi (3.7%) or less than a powder load reduction of less than 0.3 grains.
Interestingly, if you seated the bullets with case length of 1.750 out to 1.798 OAL you would get the same results as if you trimmed to 1.700. I've seated my bullets out that far in my CZ bolt action to get closer to the rifling and improve accuracy (My CZ has a very deep chamber). No one gets all that excited when you do that as long as you have enough bullet shank in the neck.
Practically, if you chronograph your loads, you should expect your best reloads to average 7 to 10 fps variation across the same set of reloads. You're only going to be offset just under 3 times that.
I've had chronograph results for some loads that averaged 25 fps variation when the loading techniques were questionable or the casings were at the end of their useful life.
Results with different powders might differ slightly.
If it were me, I would load those cases and shot them and then neck size the cases to let the necks stretch a bit.
I doubt you will see a difference in accuracy in group size for the loads with the short case length but the impact point might be slightly lower.