Has anyone had the opportunity to put one of the short barrels across a chronograph? I'm thinking of the North American Arms little revolvers chambered in .22 magnum, but more especially one of the Smith J Frames.
I would be really interested in knowing if the magnum velocity generated out of such short barrels is actually great enough to be significantly better than a standard .22LR.
I don't want to start a discussion over whether a .22 is or is not a self defense round. Sometimes (very seldom, but once in awhile) a very small revolver is the only thing that makes sense for me to carry. Much better than nothing! The rest of the time, which is pretty much all my waking hours, I carry either a full size 1911 or a 4 1/4" 1911, so a self defense caliber discussion is not relevant to my question.
Is there a significant difference in velocity between a .22LR and a .22 magnum out of one of the short barrels? Is there even enough velocity generated to allow one of the .22 magnum hollow points to mushroom? If anyone has had the opportunity to run this over a chronograph, I would really appreciate your input. Thanks.
I would be really interested in knowing if the magnum velocity generated out of such short barrels is actually great enough to be significantly better than a standard .22LR.
I don't want to start a discussion over whether a .22 is or is not a self defense round. Sometimes (very seldom, but once in awhile) a very small revolver is the only thing that makes sense for me to carry. Much better than nothing! The rest of the time, which is pretty much all my waking hours, I carry either a full size 1911 or a 4 1/4" 1911, so a self defense caliber discussion is not relevant to my question.
Is there a significant difference in velocity between a .22LR and a .22 magnum out of one of the short barrels? Is there even enough velocity generated to allow one of the .22 magnum hollow points to mushroom? If anyone has had the opportunity to run this over a chronograph, I would really appreciate your input. Thanks.