2018 Assault Weapons Ban HR5087

K

Kleinzeit

New member
AWB of 2017 vs. AWB of 2018

There are currently two bills proposing to ban "assault weapons," the second proposed last Monday (Feb. 26, 2018).

I've been reading through them and trying to work out what the difference is. Does anyone have any insight into this? I admit to not having much understanding about these processes, but it isn't clear to me why two bills are up.

~Graeme
 
"Why are two bills up?"

Wishful thinking and drumming up mid-term support and donations.

What scares me is Trump (and the NRA's ATF ban on "anything that spends up shooting"). That would include a trigger job and that is very worrisome.

I don't think the ATF can do it though or Obama's ATF would have.
 
I don't know for sure; however, I would bet there are certain people in the US congress that re-submit the identical or slightly modified AWB bill every session. Knowing they will never pass, but allows them to tell their constituents they did their job toward gun control.
 
A few words may have been tweaked here and there, but it's the same bill. It's been the same since the 2010 session, and as far back as 1994, Feinstein was pushing functionally identical bills.
 
It is horrible. Notice that the number of features constituting an "assault weapon" has been lowered. If it passed, replacing a stock or barrel could be enough to snare an otherwise law-abiding person into a felony charge.

And that's the real point of this. Just as with the last AWB, we'll see very few actual criminals being prosecuted for violations. Instead, they'll go after the guy who put a barrel with a bayonet lug on a receiver with a collapsible stock.

The ultimate goal is to inflict a chilling effect on gun ownership in general.

Also notice that if you DO have a grandfathered "assault weapon," it appears illegal to ever transfer it to anyone else.

Do not assume this will die in committee. The President has voiced support for it, and given the tidal wave of emotional manipulation, anything is possible.
 
The main differences I've been able to ascertain beyween the '94 AWB and the new ones are:

They've removed flash suppressor and bayonet lug from the list of restricted features; added threaded barrel, forward grip, and barrel shroud.

Whereas the previous AWB allowed ONE restricted feature in combination with a detachable magazine, the new ones allow NONE.
 
Look at the list of banned firearms. Clearly going after modern semi-automatic everything. If this is not proof of the radical left working to do away with the 2nd amendment, don't know how it could be any more clear. The ultimate goal is to disarm the population.

First the elites will take away all semi-auto firearms. After all, what sane person needs to own a gun that can fire multiple bullets in rapid succession. Next it will be revolvers and bolt action rifles that a sane person has no need to own. Who could possibly need more than a manually loaded single shot firearm for hunting or target shooting. Oh, and also along the way ammunition will be highly taxed and quantities limited.

If muskets were good enough in 1776, why do we need anything better today?
 
Exempting Garands (that should bring their prices up!) and Mini-14's again. And almost all the autoloading rimfires....except the "bad" rifle ones like the S&W15-22. It isn't exempted.
 
President can say what ever he wants, but people on the judicial committee are most likely thinking the same about trump that I am. And it isn't pretty.
Besides I don't believe even Ryan would bring it to the floor for a vote.

Now if it resembled the old AWB I could see dump signing it.

If they bring a bill for under 21, I would say yes, it has a chance. But not this one.

But what the he'll do I know!
 
Assuming this bill makes passed the house. I'll take odds on that not happening. I'll also take odds it can't get 60 votes in the senate. Trump will never see it.
 
Do not assume
Click to expand...

Do not assume anything. Write your congress folk and donate to the nra-ila. I was not concerned after even las Vegas. I am concerned now. I don't actually think we will get an AWB that looks like this. But I see us possibly losing things that are important. I could see a mag cap ban. Even rubio said he could support it.
 
Do not assume anything. Write your congress folk and donate to the nra-ila. I was not concerned after even las Vegas. I am concerned now. I don't actually think we will get an AWB that looks like this. But I see us possibly losing things that are important. I could see a mag cap ban. Even rubio said he could support it.
Click to expand...

I don't.
 
In spite of some notable mass shootings over the past 20 years, scientific surveys show that military-pattern semiautomatics have a higher public approval rating than Congress and the Mainstream Media COMBINED.


G4wzmKq.png


http://news.gallup.com/poll/196658/support-assault-weapons-ban-record-low.aspx



gA3ProQ.png


http://news.gallup.com/poll/223598/2017-congressional-job-approval-average-remains-low.aspx



fqFCFs0.png


http://news.gallup.com/poll/195542/americans-trust-mass-media-sinks-new-low.aspx


I strongly suspect that politicians are aware of these Gallup findings - if they enact another AW Ban, it would be purposeful disregard for public opinion.... and then the job of the Mainstream Media will be to "buffalo" us with the notion that public sentiment made the ban inevitable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top