I am on a 1911 bug lately since I am forced (due to financial and personal reasons) to concentrate on only one firearm. This is my home defense, range and eventually CCW piece (yeah, right in Erie County, New York). I have two young boys that have never seen any of my firearms yet (2 1/2 and 1). I used to own some revolvers and even a Pony Pocketlite. I am lucky enough to have some healthy and strong kids. I know the two year old could cock the hammer on the revolvers and pull the trigger on the Pocketlite. (Before anyone gets started, they are all stored without ammo in a large gun safe....I recently installed a Gun Vault in my bedroom for my home defense piece)Anyways, I started thinking about loaded firearms and children. When you look at most of the designs out there the 1911 seems to pull ahead in terms of safety. Assuming all guns are loaded and ready to go (round in chamber(s), cocked and locked, mag inserted)if you had a revolver, pull back the hammer or pull the trigger; Glock and similar, pull the trigger; Sig, pull the trigger; Beretta/S&W have a slight advantage with a safety; Browning Hi-Power, safety; I suppose in Browning and Smith case have the mag out silghtly to use mag safety but kinda defeats the purpose of having a ready home defense gun; this brings me to the 1911, safety and grip safety. As I mentioned, my two year old is pretty strong but he does not have big hands, I don't think it is possible for him to depress the safety with only one hand (of course two hands kinda makes this argument mute). Just rambling and wondering what everyone elses opinion was. Kinda ironic that what some people consider too dangerous a gun to carry seems to have the most safety features (safety, grip safety and even a firing pin block on Paras and Colts). Thanks for reading.
------------------
------------------